Department of Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.
Wound Repair Regen. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):402-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00781.x.
Collagen prostheses used to repair abdominal wall defects, depending on their pretreatment (noncross-linked vs. cross-linked), besides repair may also achieve tissue regeneration. We assessed the host tissue incorporation of different bioprostheses using a new tool that combines immunofluorescence confocal microscopy with differential interference contrast images, making it possible to distinguish newly formed collagen. Partial hernial defects in the abdominal wall of rabbits were repaired using cross-linked/noncross-linked bioprostheses. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) was used as control. After 14/30/90/180 days of implant, specimens were taken for microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative-reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to determine host tissue ingrowth and collagen I/III protein and 1a1/3a1 gene expression. Shrinkage and stress resistance were also examined. At 14 days, cross-linked prostheses had suffered significantly less shrinkage than ePTFE or noncross-linked prostheses. Significantly higher shrinkage was recorded for ePTFE in the longer term. Microscopy revealed encapsulation of ePTFE by neoformed tissue, while the bioprostheses became gradually infiltrated by host tissue. Noncross-linked prosthesis showed better tissue ingrowth, more intense inflammatory reaction and more rapid degradation than the cross-linked prostheses. At 14 days, cross-linked prostheses induced up-regulated collagen 1a1 and 3a1 gene expression, while noncross-linked only showed increased collagen III protein expression at 90 days postimplant. At 6 months, the tensile strengths of cross-linked prostheses were significantly greater compared with ePTFE. Our findings demonstrate that despite the cross-linked collagen prostheses promoting less tissue ingrowth than the noncross-linked meshes, they became gradually replaced by good quality host tissue and were less rapidly degraded, leading to improved stress resistance in the long term.
用于修复腹壁缺损的胶原蛋白假体,根据其预处理(非交联与交联),除了修复还可能实现组织再生。我们使用一种新工具评估了不同生物假体的宿主组织整合情况,该工具结合了免疫荧光共焦显微镜和微分干涉对比图像,从而能够区分新形成的胶原蛋白。通过使用交联/非交联生物假体修复兔腹壁部分疝缺损。将膨体聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)用作对照。在植入后 14/30/90/180 天,取标本进行显微镜检查、免疫组织化学和定量逆转录聚合酶链反应,以确定宿主组织内生长和 I/III 型胶原蛋白蛋白和 1a1/3a1 基因表达。还检查了收缩和抗张强度。在第 14 天,交联假体的收缩明显小于 ePTFE 或非交联假体。在较长时间内,ePTFE 的收缩明显更高。显微镜显示 ePTFE 被新生组织包裹,而生物假体逐渐被宿主组织渗透。非交联假体比交联假体具有更好的组织内生长、更强的炎症反应和更快的降解。在第 14 天,交联假体诱导 1a1 和 3a1 基因表达上调,而非交联假体仅在植入后 90 天显示出 III 型胶原蛋白蛋白表达增加。在 6 个月时,交联假体的抗张强度明显大于 ePTFE。我们的发现表明,尽管交联胶原蛋白假体比非交联网片促进的组织内生长少,但它们逐渐被高质量的宿主组织取代,并且降解速度较慢,从而在长期内提高了抗张强度。