Departament de Biologia Marina i Oceanografia, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Pg Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, E08003 Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;14(9):2334-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02772.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
The use of inorganic phosphate (Pi) and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) by different bacterial groups was studied in experimental mesocosms of P-starved eastern Mediterranean waters in the absence (control mesocosms) and presence of additional Pi (P-amended mesocosms). The low Pi turnover times in the control mesocosms and the increase in heterotrophic prokaryotic abundance and production upon Pi addition confirmed that the bacterial community was originally P-limited. The bacterioplankton groups taking up Pi and DOP were identified by means of microautoradiography combined with catalysed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization. Incubations with leucine were also performed for comparative purposes. All the probe-identified groups showed a high percentage of cells taking up Pi and DOP in the control, P-limited, mesocosms throughout the experiment. However, in response to Pi addition two contrasting scenarios in Pi use were observed: (i) on day 1 of the experiment Pi addition caused a clear reduction in the percentage of SAR11 cells taking up Pi, whereas Gammaproteobacteria, Roseobacter and Bacteroidetes showed similar percentages to the ones in the control mesocosms and (ii) on day 4 of the experiment, probably when the bacterial community had fully responded to the P input, all the probe-identified groups showed low percentages of cells taking up the substrate as compared with the control mesocosms. These differences are likely related to different P requirements among the bacterial groups and point out to the existence of two contrasting strategies in P use.
在没有(对照中养)和有额外磷(添加磷)的情况下,在实验性地中海贫磷东部中养研究了不同细菌群体对无机磷(Pi)和溶解有机磷(DOP)的利用。在对照中养中 Pi 周转率低,添加 Pi 后异养原核生物丰度和生产力增加,这证实了细菌群落最初是受磷限制的。通过结合微放射性自显影和催化报告基因沉积荧光原位杂交,鉴定了吸收 Pi 和 DOP 的浮游细菌群体。为了比较,还进行了亮氨酸孵育。在整个实验过程中,所有探针鉴定的群体在对照、贫磷中养中都表现出高比例的细胞吸收 Pi 和 DOP。然而,在添加 Pi 后,观察到两种截然不同的 Pi 利用情况:(i)在实验的第一天,添加 Pi 导致 SAR11 细胞吸收 Pi 的比例明显降低,而γ-变形菌、玫瑰杆菌和拟杆菌的比例与对照中养相似;(ii)在实验的第四天,当细菌群落对磷输入完全做出反应时,与对照中养相比,所有探针鉴定的群体的细胞吸收底物的比例都较低。这些差异可能与细菌群体之间不同的磷需求有关,并指出了磷利用中存在两种截然不同的策略。