Urban Institute Health Policy Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):899-908. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0159.
The pending Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Act and the fall presidential election raise concerns about what would happen if the insurance expansion promised by the landmark health reform law were to be curtailed. This paper's analysis of national survey estimates found that access to health care and use of health services for adults ages 19-64--the primary targets of the Affordable Care Act--deteriorated between 2000 and 2010, particularly among those who were uninsured. More than half of uninsured US adults did not see a doctor in 2010, and only slightly more than a quarter of these adults were seen by a dentist. We also found that children--many of whom qualify for public coverage through Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program--generally maintained or improved their access to care during the same period. This provides a reason for optimism about the ability of the coverage expansion in the Affordable Care Act to improve access for adults, but it suggests that eliminating the law or curtailing the coverage expansion could result in continued erosion of adults' access to care.
美国平价医疗法案的待决最高法院裁决和即将到来的总统大选引发了人们的担忧,如果这项具有里程碑意义的医疗改革法案所承诺的保险扩张被缩减,将会发生什么。本文对全国调查估计的分析发现,19 岁至 64 岁成年人(平价医疗法案的主要目标人群)的医疗保健获取和服务使用情况在 2000 年至 2010 年间恶化,尤其是在那些没有保险的人群中。超过一半的美国成年人在 2010 年没有看医生,而这些成年人中只有略多于四分之一的人看过牙医。我们还发现,儿童——其中许多人通过医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划有资格获得公共保险——在此期间通常保持或改善了他们的医疗保健获取。这为平价医疗法案的覆盖范围扩大改善成年人的医疗保健获取提供了一个理由,但这表明取消该法案或缩减覆盖范围扩大可能会导致成年人的医疗保健获取继续受到侵蚀。