Suppr超能文献

临床性和非临床性暴饮暴食。

Clinical and non-clinical binges.

作者信息

Jansen A, van den Hout M, Griez E

机构信息

Department of Mental Health Sciences/Experimental Psychopathology, Limburg University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(5):439-44. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90164-e.

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine if, and in what respects, clinical binges (reported by bulimic subjects) are different from non-clinical binges (reported by a non-clinical population). Furthermore, the study tested whether the DSM-III-R criteria and other variables that are retrospectively claimed to be defining characteristics indeed differentiate binges from non-binge eating episodes. Clinical binges appeared to differ from non-clinical binges as to amount of calories ingested and duration. With respect to subjective experience, clinical and non-clinical binges did not differ. The DSM-III-R criteria for binge eating discriminate clinical and non-clinical binges quite well from non-binges. With the addition of other seemingly important variables, binges are not discriminated better from non-binges than with the DSM-III-R variables alone. It is argued that the difference between pathological binge eating and non-clinical binge eating is mainly a matter of severity.

摘要

一项研究旨在确定临床暴饮暴食(由贪食症患者报告)是否以及在哪些方面与非临床暴饮暴食(由非临床人群报告)不同。此外,该研究还测试了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)的标准以及其他一些被回顾性地认为是定义特征的变量,是否真的能区分暴饮暴食和非暴饮暴食发作。临床暴饮暴食在摄入热量的数量和持续时间方面似乎与非临床暴饮暴食有所不同。在主观体验方面,临床和非临床暴饮暴食并无差异。DSM-III-R中暴饮暴食的标准能很好地将临床和非临床暴饮暴食与非暴饮暴食区分开来。加上其他一些看似重要的变量后,与仅使用DSM-III-R变量相比,暴饮暴食与非暴饮暴食之间的区分并没有更好。有人认为,病理性暴饮暴食和非临床暴饮暴食之间的差异主要在于严重程度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验