Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Aug;167(2):247-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10995.x. Epub 2012 May 14.
Systematic studies of delusional infestation (DI), also known as delusional parasitosis, are scarce. They lack either dermatological or psychiatric detail. Little is known about the specimens that patients provide to prove their infestation. There is no study on the current presentation of DI in Europe.
To determine the number of true infestations, to assess with which pathogens patients believe themselves to be infested, and to gather details about the frequency and nature of the specimens and the containers used to store them, based on European study centres.
Retrospective study of consecutive cases with suspected DI from six centres (Dermatology, Psychiatry, Tropical Medicine) in four European countries (U.K., Germany, Italy, France).
In total, 148 consecutive cases of suspected DI were included, i.e. the largest cohort reported. None of the patients had evidence of a genuine infestation, as shown by examinations by dermatologists and/or infectious disease specialists. Only 35% believed themselves to be infested by parasites; the majority reported a large number of other living or inanimate (17%) pathogens. Seventy-one patients (48%) presented with what they believed was proof of their infestation. These specimens were mostly skin particles or hair, and rarely insects (only very few of which were human pathogenic or anthropophilic, and none of these could be correlated with the clinical presentation), and only 4% were stored in matchboxes (three of 71).
This first multicentre study of DI in Europe confirms that the term 'delusional infestation' better reflects current and future variations of this entity than 'delusional parasitosis'. The presentation of proofs of infestation, commonly referred to as 'the matchbox sign', is typical but not obligatory in DI and might better be called 'the specimen sign'.
系统性研究妄想性感染(DI),也称为妄想性寄生虫病,非常罕见。这些研究缺乏皮肤科或精神病学的详细信息。对于患者提供来证明其感染的标本知之甚少。目前,在欧洲还没有关于 DI 的研究。
确定真正感染的数量,评估患者认为自己感染的病原体,并根据欧洲研究中心收集有关标本的频率、性质和用于储存标本的容器的详细信息。
回顾性研究来自四个欧洲国家(英国、德国、意大利和法国)六个中心(皮肤科、精神病科、热带医学科)的 148 例连续疑似 DI 病例。
共纳入 148 例连续疑似 DI 病例,这是报告的最大队列。皮肤科医生和/或传染病专家检查后,没有发现任何真正感染的证据。只有 35%的患者认为自己感染了寄生虫;大多数患者报告了大量其他活体或无生命的(17%)病原体。71 名患者(48%)提供了他们认为是感染证据的东西。这些标本主要是皮肤颗粒或头发,很少是昆虫(只有极少数是人类致病或嗜人致病的,而且没有一种与临床表现相关),只有 4%存放在火柴盒中(71 例中有 3 例)。
这是欧洲首次对 DI 进行的多中心研究,证实了“妄想性感染”一词比“妄想性寄生虫病”更好地反映了该实体目前和未来的变化。所谓的“火柴盒征”,即感染证明的呈现,是 DI 的典型表现但非必需表现,可能更好地被称为“标本征”。