Letovanec I, Allenbach G, Mihaescu A, Nicod Lalonde M, Schmidt S, Stupp R, Fitting J-W, Boubaker A, Ris H-B, Prior J O
University Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland.
Nuklearmedizin. 2012;51(5):186-93. doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0470-12-01. Epub 2012 May 15.
Pleural effusion is common in cancer patients and to determine its malignant origin is of huge clinical significance. PET/CT with ¹⁸F-FDG is of diagnostic value in staging and follow-up, but its ability to differentiate between malignant and benign effusions is not precisely known.
PATIENTS, METHODS: We examined 50 PET/CT from 47 patients (29 men, 18 women, 60 ± 16 years) with pleural effusion and known cancer (24 NSCLC, 7 lymphomas, 5 breasts, 4 GIST, 3 mesotheliomas, 2 head and neck, 2 malignant teratoma, 1 colorectal, 1 oesophageal, 1 melanoma) for FDG uptake in the effusions using SUV(max). This was correlated to cytopathology performed after a median of 21 days (interquartile range -3 to 23), which included pH, relative distribution (macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, plasmocytes), and absolute cell count.
Malignant cells were found in 17 effusions (34%) (6 NSCLC, 5 lymphomas, 2 breasts, 2 mesotheliomas, 2 malignant teratomas). SUV in malignant effusions were higher than in benign ones [3.7 (95%CI 1.8-5.6) vs. 1.7 g/ml (1.5-1.9), p = 0.001], with a correlation between malignant effusion and SUV (Spearman coefficient r = 0.50, p = 0.001), but not with other cytopathological or radiological parameters (ROC area 0.83 ± 0.06). Using a 2.2-mg/l SUV threshold, 12 PET/CT studies were positive and 38 negative with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 53%, 91%, 75% and 79%, respectively. For NSCLC only (n = 24), ROC area was 0.95 ± 0.04, 7 studies were positive and 17 negative with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 83%, 89%, 71 and 94%, respectively.
PET/CT may help to differentiate the malignant or benign origin of a pleural effusion with a high specificity in patients with known cancer, in particular NSCLC.
胸腔积液在癌症患者中很常见,确定其恶性来源具有重大临床意义。¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT在肿瘤分期及随访中具有诊断价值,但其鉴别恶性与良性胸腔积液的能力尚不完全清楚。
我们对47例(29例男性,18例女性,年龄60±16岁)已知患有癌症(24例非小细胞肺癌、7例淋巴瘤、5例乳腺癌、4例胃肠道间质瘤、3例间皮瘤、2例头颈部肿瘤、2例恶性畸胎瘤、1例结直肠癌、1例食管癌、1例黑色素瘤)且伴有胸腔积液的患者进行了50次PET/CT检查,使用SUV(最大值)评估胸腔积液中的FDG摄取情况。将其与中位时间21天(四分位间距-3至23天)后进行的细胞病理学检查结果相关联,细胞病理学检查包括pH值、相对分布(巨噬细胞、中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、浆细胞)及绝对细胞计数。
17例(34%)胸腔积液中发现恶性细胞(6例非小细胞肺癌、5例淋巴瘤、2例乳腺癌、2例间皮瘤、2例恶性畸胎瘤)。恶性胸腔积液的SUV高于良性胸腔积液[3.7(95%可信区间1.8 - 5.6)对1.7 g/ml(1.5 - 1.9),p = 0.001],恶性胸腔积液与SUV之间存在相关性(Spearman系数r = 0.50,p = 0.001),但与其他细胞病理学或放射学参数无相关性(ROC曲线面积0.83±0.06)。使用2.2 mg/l的SUV阈值,12例PET/CT检查结果为阳性,38例为阴性,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为53%、91%、75%和79%。仅对于非小细胞肺癌(n = 24),ROC曲线面积为0.95±0.04,7例检查结果为阳性,17例为阴性,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83%、89%