Fertility Clinic, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Semin Reprod Med. 2012 Jun;30(3):230-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311525. Epub 2012 May 14.
Worldwide freezing and thawing of embryos has been increasingly used since the first infant was born as a result of this technique in 1984. The use of frozen embryo replacement (FER) currently even exceeds the number of fresh cycles performed in some countries. This article discusses the pros and cons of FER versus fresh-embryo transfer with regard to both single-cycle and cumulative pregnancy and delivery rates. The review discusses the obvious advantages of FER: minimizing the proportion of pharmacological and surgical treatments, and lowering the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies, thereby increasing the safety for mother and child. Finally the article describes the accumulating literature on perinatal and long-term child outcome after transfer of frozen/thawed embryos, including a discussion on the concerns regarding cryo techniques and their possible roles in the subsequent development of fetus and child. Because larger and more detailed data sets are available for early cleavage-stage embryo freezing and slow freezing, they are the main focus of this review.
自 1984 年首例婴儿通过这项技术诞生以来,全球范围内对胚胎进行冷冻和解冻的应用越来越多。在一些国家,冷冻胚胎移植(FER)的使用甚至超过了新鲜周期的数量。本文讨论了 FER 与新鲜胚胎移植相比在单周期和累积妊娠率和分娩率方面的优缺点。综述讨论了 FER 的明显优势:最大限度地减少药物和手术治疗的比例,降低卵巢过度刺激综合征和多胎妊娠的风险,从而提高母婴安全性。最后,文章描述了关于冷冻/解冻胚胎移植后的围产期和儿童长期结局的累积文献,包括对冷冻技术的关注及其在随后胎儿和儿童发育中可能发挥的作用的讨论。由于早期卵裂期胚胎冷冻和慢速冷冻有更大和更详细的数据集,因此它们是本综述的主要重点。