Suppr超能文献

硼替佐米-沙利度胺-地塞米松三联方案优于沙利度胺-地塞米松二联方案,用于自体移植后进展或复发的多发性骨髓瘤患者:来自欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会慢性白血病工作组的 MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 随机 III 期试验。

Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone over the dual combination of thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation: the MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 Randomized Phase III Trial from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

机构信息

University Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2475-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.4918. Epub 2012 May 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This prospective multicenter phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of a triple combination (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone [VTD]) versus a dual combination (thalidomide-dexamethasone [TD]) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) progressing or relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 269 patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus) or no bortezomib for 1 year, in combination with thalidomide (200 mg per day orally) and dexamethasone (40 mg orally once a day on 4 days once every 3 weeks). Bortezomib was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with a 10-day rest period (day 12 to day 21) for eight cycles (6 months), and then on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 with a 20-day rest period (day 23 to day 42) for four cycles (6 months).

RESULTS

Median time to progression (primary end point) was significantly longer with VTD than TD (19.5 v13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80; P = .001), the complete response plus near-complete response rate was higher (45% v 21%; P 0.001), and the median duration of response was longer (17.9 v 13.4 months; P.04) [corrected].The 24-month survival rate was in favor of VTD (71% v 65%; P = .093). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with VTD (29% v 12%; P = .001) as were the rates of grades 3 and 4 infection and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

VTD was more effective than TD in the treatment of patients with MM with progressive or relapsing disease post-ASCT but was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性多中心 III 期研究比较了三药联合(硼替佐米-沙利度胺-地塞米松[VTD])与二药联合(沙利度胺-地塞米松[TD])在自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后进展或复发的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

共有 269 例患者被随机分配接受硼替佐米(1.3 mg/m2静脉推注)或不接受硼替佐米治疗 1 年,联合沙利度胺(每天 200 mg 口服)和地塞米松(每周 3 次,第 1、4、8 和 11 天口服 40 mg)。硼替佐米在 8 个周期(6 个月)中于第 1、4、8 和 11 天给药,每个周期有 10 天的休息期(第 12 天至第 21 天),然后在第 4 个周期(6 个月)中于第 1、8、15 和 22 天给药,每个周期有 20 天的休息期(第 23 天至第 42 天)。

结果

VTD 组的中位无进展时间(主要终点)明显长于 TD 组(19.5 v13.8 个月;风险比,0.59;95%CI,0.44 至 0.80;P =.001),完全缓解加接近完全缓解率更高(45% v 21%;P 0.001),缓解持续时间也更长(17.9 v 13.4 个月;P 0.04)[校正]。24 个月生存率有利于 VTD 组(71% v 65%;P =.093)。VTD 组更常见 3 级周围神经病(29% v 12%;P =.001)和 3 级和 4 级感染及血小板减少症发生率更高。

结论

VTD 治疗 ASCT 后进展或复发的 MM 患者比 TD 更有效,但神经毒性 3 级发生率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验