University Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2475-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.4918. Epub 2012 May 14.
This prospective multicenter phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of a triple combination (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone [VTD]) versus a dual combination (thalidomide-dexamethasone [TD]) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) progressing or relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).
Overall, 269 patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus) or no bortezomib for 1 year, in combination with thalidomide (200 mg per day orally) and dexamethasone (40 mg orally once a day on 4 days once every 3 weeks). Bortezomib was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with a 10-day rest period (day 12 to day 21) for eight cycles (6 months), and then on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 with a 20-day rest period (day 23 to day 42) for four cycles (6 months).
Median time to progression (primary end point) was significantly longer with VTD than TD (19.5 v13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80; P = .001), the complete response plus near-complete response rate was higher (45% v 21%; P 0.001), and the median duration of response was longer (17.9 v 13.4 months; P.04) [corrected].The 24-month survival rate was in favor of VTD (71% v 65%; P = .093). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with VTD (29% v 12%; P = .001) as were the rates of grades 3 and 4 infection and thrombocytopenia.
VTD was more effective than TD in the treatment of patients with MM with progressive or relapsing disease post-ASCT but was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity.
本前瞻性多中心 III 期研究比较了三药联合(硼替佐米-沙利度胺-地塞米松[VTD])与二药联合(沙利度胺-地塞米松[TD])在自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后进展或复发的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中的疗效和安全性。
共有 269 例患者被随机分配接受硼替佐米(1.3 mg/m2静脉推注)或不接受硼替佐米治疗 1 年,联合沙利度胺(每天 200 mg 口服)和地塞米松(每周 3 次,第 1、4、8 和 11 天口服 40 mg)。硼替佐米在 8 个周期(6 个月)中于第 1、4、8 和 11 天给药,每个周期有 10 天的休息期(第 12 天至第 21 天),然后在第 4 个周期(6 个月)中于第 1、8、15 和 22 天给药,每个周期有 20 天的休息期(第 23 天至第 42 天)。
VTD 组的中位无进展时间(主要终点)明显长于 TD 组(19.5 v13.8 个月;风险比,0.59;95%CI,0.44 至 0.80;P =.001),完全缓解加接近完全缓解率更高(45% v 21%;P 0.001),缓解持续时间也更长(17.9 v 13.4 个月;P 0.04)[校正]。24 个月生存率有利于 VTD 组(71% v 65%;P =.093)。VTD 组更常见 3 级周围神经病(29% v 12%;P =.001)和 3 级和 4 级感染及血小板减少症发生率更高。
VTD 治疗 ASCT 后进展或复发的 MM 患者比 TD 更有效,但神经毒性 3 级发生率更高。