Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(5):e1002651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002651. Epub 2012 May 10.
Genome reduction has been observed in many bacterial lineages that have adapted to specialized environments. The extreme genome degradation seen for obligate pathogens and symbionts appears to be dominated by genetic drift. In contrast, for free-living organisms with reduced genomes, the dominant force is proposed to be direct selection for smaller, streamlined genomes. Most variation in gene content for these free-living species is of "accessory" genes, which are commonly gained as large chromosomal islands that are adaptive for specialized traits such as pathogenicity. It is generally unclear, however, whether the process of accessory gene loss is largely driven by drift or selection. Here we demonstrate that selection for gene loss, and not a shortened genome, per se, drove massive, rapid reduction of accessory genes. In just 1,500 generations of experimental evolution, 80% of populations of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 experienced nearly parallel deletions removing up to 10% of the genome from a megaplasmid present in this strain. The absence of these deletion events in a mutation accumulation experiment suggested that selection, rather than drift, has dominated the process. Reconstructing these deletions confirmed that they were beneficial in their selective regimes, but led to decreased performance in alternative environments. These results indicate that selection can be crucial in eliminating unnecessary genes during the early stages of adaptation to a specialized environment.
在适应特殊环境的许多细菌谱系中观察到基因组缩小。专性病原体和共生体中看到的极端基因组退化似乎主要是由遗传漂变主导的。相比之下,对于基因组较小的自由生活生物,主导力量据说是直接选择更小、更精简的基因组。这些自由生活物种的基因含量变化大多数是“附属”基因,这些基因通常作为适应特定特征(如致病性)的大型染色体岛获得。然而,一般来说,附属基因丢失的过程主要是由漂变还是选择驱动的还不清楚。在这里,我们证明了基因丢失的选择,而不是缩短的基因组本身,驱动了大量快速的附属基因减少。在仅仅 1500 代的实验进化中,甲基杆菌 AM1 的 80%的种群经历了几乎平行的缺失,从该菌株中存在的一个巨型质粒中去除了多达 10%的基因组。在突变积累实验中没有这些缺失事件表明,选择而不是漂变主导了这个过程。重建这些缺失证实了它们在选择性环境中是有益的,但在替代环境中表现下降。这些结果表明,选择在适应特殊环境的早期阶段消除不必要的基因时可能是至关重要的。