School of Public Health, Department of General Practice, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Oct;6(3):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 16.
To study all-cause mortality and pharmacological treatment intensity in relation to baseline glucose metabolism and HbA1c following high risk screening for diabetes in primary care.
Persons aged 40-69 years (N=163,185) received mailed diabetes risk questionnaires. 20,916 persons without diabetes but with high risk of diabetes were stratified by glucose metabolism (normal glucose tolerance (NGT), dysglycemia (IFG or IGT) or diabetes) and by HbA1c at screening (<6%, 6.0-6.4% or ≥ 6.5%). Median follow-up was 6.6 years. Excess mortality was calculated by hazard ratio.
HR for all-cause mortality increased with increasing levels of HbA1c at screening in people with NGT and dysglycemia. In people with screen detected diabetes the opposite relation was found. In people with diabetes redeemed prescription rates for lipid-, blood pressure- and glucose-lowering drugs increased significantly following screening and prescription rates increased with increasing levels of HbA1c at screening. The same trend in redeemed prescriptions was seen for people with dysglycemia and NGT, but the absolute rates were significantly lower than those among people with screen detected diabetes.
This study confirms HbA1c as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in non-diabetic individuals. A likely explanation for the inverse relation found between all-cause mortality and HbA1c at screening among those with screen detected diabetes would be that intensive treatment near-normalizes mortality. The small group of people with NGT and HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, who had the highest all-cause mortality, may benefit from being labelled and treated as having diabetes although this group may have special characteristics not accounted for in this study.
研究在初级保健中进行糖尿病高危人群筛查后,与基线血糖代谢和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)相关的全因死亡率和药物治疗强度。
年龄在 40-69 岁之间的(N=163185)人收到了邮寄的糖尿病风险问卷。20916 名无糖尿病但有糖尿病高风险的人根据血糖代谢(正常糖耐量(NGT)、糖调节受损(IFG 或 IGT)或糖尿病)和筛查时的 HbA1c(<6%、6.0-6.4%或≥6.5%)进行分层。中位随访时间为 6.6 年。通过风险比计算超额死亡率。
在 NGT 和糖调节受损的人群中,随着筛查时 HbA1c 水平的升高,全因死亡率的 HR 增加。在筛查出的糖尿病患者中,发现了相反的关系。在患有糖尿病的人群中,筛查后开具降血脂、降压和降糖药物的处方率显著增加,且随着筛查时 HbA1c 水平的升高,处方率也随之增加。在糖调节受损和 NGT 的人群中也观察到了相同的趋势,但绝对比率明显低于筛查出的糖尿病患者。
本研究证实 HbA1c 是非糖尿病个体全因死亡率的独立预测因素。在筛查出的糖尿病患者中,筛查时 HbA1c 与全因死亡率之间呈负相关的可能解释是,强化治疗使死亡率接近正常化。一小部分 HbA1c≥6.5%的 NGT 人群全因死亡率最高,可能受益于被标记并被视为患有糖尿病,尽管这一人群可能具有本研究未考虑到的特殊特征。