Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):821-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 16.
People with non-specific low back pain (LBP) show hampered performance of dynamic tasks such as sit-to-stance-to-sit movement. However, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess if proprioceptive impairments influence the performance of the sit-to-stance-to-sit movement. First, the proprioceptive steering of 20 healthy subjects and 106 persons with mild LBP was identified during standing using muscle vibration. Second, five sit-to-stance-to-sit repetitions on a stable support and on foam were performed as fast as possible. Total duration, phase duration, center of pressure (COP) displacement, pelvic and thoracic kinematics were analyzed. People with LBP used less lumbar proprioceptive afference for postural control compared to healthy people (P < 0.0001) and needed more time to perform the five repetitions in both postural conditions (P < 0.05). These time differences were determined in the stance and sit phases (transition phases), but not in the focal movement phases. Moreover, later onsets of anterior pelvic rotation initiation were recorded to start both movement sequences (P < 0.05) and to move from sit-to-stance on foam (P < 0.05). Decreased use of lumbar proprioceptive afference in people with LBP seemed to have a negative influence on the sit-to-stance-to-sit performance and more specifically on the transition phases which demand more control (i.e. sit and stance). Furthermore, slower onsets to initiate the pelvis rotation to move from sit-to-stance illustrate a decrease in pelvic preparatory movement in the LBP group.
患有非特异性下腰痛(LBP)的人在进行动态任务(如坐-站-坐运动)时表现出运动能力受损。然而,其潜在机制尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估本体感觉障碍是否会影响坐-站-坐运动的表现。首先,通过肌肉振动在站立时确定 20 名健康受试者和 106 名轻度 LBP 患者的本体感觉转向。其次,在稳定支撑和泡沫上尽可能快地完成五次坐-站-坐重复。分析总持续时间、相位持续时间、压力中心(COP)位移、骨盆和胸椎运动学。与健康人相比,LBP 患者在姿势控制中使用的腰椎本体感觉传入较少(P < 0.0001),并且在两种姿势条件下完成五次重复所需的时间更多(P < 0.05)。这些时间差异在站立和坐姿阶段(过渡阶段)中确定,但不在焦点运动阶段中确定。此外,记录到骨盆前旋转开始的延迟,以启动两个运动序列(P < 0.05),并在泡沫上从坐到站(P < 0.05)移动。LBP 患者腰椎本体感觉传入的减少似乎对坐-站-坐运动表现产生负面影响,特别是在需要更多控制的过渡阶段(即坐和站)。此外,LBP 组开始从坐到站移动时骨盆旋转的起始较慢,表明骨盆预备运动减少。