W M Keck FT-ICR Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Sep;11(9):814-23. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O112.017145. Epub 2012 May 17.
No consensus has been reached on the proper time to add stable-isotope labeled (SIL) peptides in protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry workflows. While quantifying 24 monolignol pathway enzymes in the xylem tissue of Populus trichocarpa, we compared the protein concentrations obtained when adding the SIL standard peptides concurrently with the enzyme or after quenching of the digestion (i.e. postdigestion) and observed discrepancies for nearly all tryptic peptides investigated. In some cases, greater than 30-fold differences were observed. To explain these differences and potentially correct for them, we developed a mathematical model based on pseudo-first-order kinetics to account for the dynamic production and decay (e.g. degradation and precipitation) of the native peptide targets in conjunction with the decay of the SIL peptide standards. A time course study of the digests confirmed the results predicted by the proposed model and revealed that the discrepancy between concurrent and postdigestion introduction of the SIL standards was related to differential decay experienced by the SIL peptide and the native peptide in each method. Given these results, we propose concurrent introduction of the SIL peptide is most appropriate, though not free from bias. Mathematical modeling of this method reveals that overestimation of protein quantities would still result when rapid peptide decay occurs and that this bias would be further exaggerated by slow proteolysis. We derive a simple equation to estimate the bias for each peptide based on the relative rates of production and decay. According to this equation, nearly half of the peptides evaluated here were estimated to have quantitative errors greater than 10% and in a few cases over 100%. We conclude that the instability of peptides can often significantly bias the protein quantities measured in protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry-based assays and suggest peptide stability be made a priority when selecting peptides to use for quantification.
对于在蛋白质酶切同位素稀释质谱分析工作流程中何时添加稳定同位素标记(SIL)肽,尚未达成共识。在量化杨属木质部组织中 24 种单酚途径酶时,我们比较了同时添加 SIL 标准肽与酶或消化后(即消化后)添加 SIL 标准肽时获得的蛋白质浓度,发现几乎所有研究的胰蛋白酶肽都存在差异。在某些情况下,观察到超过 30 倍的差异。为了解释这些差异并可能进行校正,我们开发了一个基于拟一级动力学的数学模型,以解释天然肽靶标的动态产生和衰减(例如降解和沉淀)与 SIL 肽标准品衰减的关系。消化物的时间过程研究证实了所提出模型预测的结果,并揭示了同步和消化后引入 SIL 标准品之间的差异与 SIL 肽和每种方法中天然肽的衰减有关。鉴于这些结果,我们建议同时引入 SIL 肽最合适,尽管并非没有偏见。这种方法的数学建模表明,当肽快速降解时,仍会导致蛋白质数量的高估,并且这种偏差会因蛋白酶解缓慢而进一步夸大。我们根据生产和衰减的相对速率,为每个肽推导出一个简单的方程来估计偏差。根据该方程,这里评估的近一半肽估计具有大于 10%的定量误差,在少数情况下超过 100%。我们得出结论,肽的不稳定性通常会显著偏置基于蛋白质酶切同位素稀释质谱分析的测定中的蛋白质数量,并建议在选择用于定量的肽时优先考虑肽的稳定性。