College of Pharmacy, Touro University-California, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):649-56. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01089.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
Congress passed the Drug-Free Workplace Act in April 1988, which resulted in the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs. The intent was to establish a substance-free work environment for all federal workers by requiring that all federal employees pass a urine drug test before employment. These guidelines specifically, and exclusively, focus on testing urine specimens for metabolites of marijuana, cocaine, phencyclidine, opiates (focusing on heroin metabolites), and amphetamines (including Ecstasy). Since then, there have been many scientific, technical, and legal challenges to the validity of urine drug testing. In response, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a division operating under the executive branch of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, put forth, through many revisions, strict procedural guidelines and specimen validity-testing criteria to manage suspicious or adulterated samples during and after urine collection. This review focuses on the legal ramifications, the procedural process, and the sensitivity and specificity of the two urine drug tests used for workplace drug testing: immunoassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Moreover, we dissect the problematic issue of cross-sensitivity between illicit and prescription drugs, and how this affects the validity of future urine drug testing.
国会于 1988 年 4 月通过了《联邦工作场所禁毒法》,由此产生了《联邦工作场所药物测试计划强制性准则》。其目的是通过要求所有联邦雇员在就业前通过尿液药物测试,为所有联邦工作人员建立一个无毒品的工作环境。这些准则专门且专门针对测试尿液样本中大麻、可卡因、苯环己哌啶、阿片类药物(重点是海洛因代谢物)和苯丙胺(包括摇头丸)的代谢物。从那时起,尿液药物测试的有效性受到了许多科学、技术和法律方面的挑战。作为回应,美国卫生与公众服务部下属的一个执行部门——物质滥用和精神健康服务管理局,通过多次修订,提出了严格的程序准则和样本有效性测试标准,以管理尿液采集过程中和之后可疑或掺假的样本。本综述重点讨论了用于工作场所药物测试的两种尿液药物测试(免疫测定和气相色谱-质谱法)的法律后果、程序过程以及敏感性和特异性。此外,我们还剖析了非法和处方药物之间交叉敏感性的问题,以及这如何影响未来尿液药物测试的有效性。