Suppr超能文献

抗瓦螨蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)在用于作物授粉的迁徙养蜂中的功能。

Functionality of Varroa-resistant honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) when used in migratory beekeeping for crop pollination.

机构信息

USDA-ARS Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Laboratory, 1157 Ben Hur Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2012 Apr;105(2):313-21. doi: 10.1603/ec11286.

Abstract

Two types of honey bees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), bred for resistance to Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman were evaluated for performance when used in migratory crop pollination. Colonies of Russian honey bees (RHB) and outcrossed bees with Varroa-sensitive hygiene (VSH) were managed without miticide treatments and compared with colonies of Italian honey bees that served as controls. Control colonies were managed as groups which either were treated twice each year against V. destructor (CT) or kept untreated (CU). Totals of 240 and 247 colonies were established initially for trials in 2008 and 2009, respectively. RHB and VSH colonies generally had adult and brood populations similar to those of the standard CT group regarding pollination requirements. For pollination of almonds [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A.Webb] in February, percentages of colonies meeting the required six or more frames of adult bees were 57% (VSH), 56% (CT), 39% (RHB), and 34% (CU). RHB are known to have small colonies in early spring, but this can be overcome with appropriate feeding. For later pollination requirements in May to July, 94-100% of colonies in the four groups met pollination size requirements for apples (Malus domestica Borkh.), cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton), and lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton). Infestations with V. destructor usually were lowest in CT colonies and tended to be lower in VSH colonies than in RHB and CU colonies. This study demonstrates that bees with the VSH trait and pure RHB offer alternatives for beekeepers to use for commercial crop pollination while reducing reliance on miticides. The high frequency of queen loss (only approximately one fourth of original queens survived each year) suggests that frequent requeening is necessary to maintain desired genetics.

摘要

两种用于培育抗瓦螨能力的蜜蜂,意大利蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)和俄罗斯蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.),被评估用于迁徙作物授粉时的表现。俄罗斯蜜蜂(RHB)和具有瓦螨敏感卫生习性(VSH)的杂交蜜蜂的蜂群在没有杀螨剂处理的情况下进行管理,并与作为对照的意大利蜜蜂(Italian honey bees)的蜂群进行比较。对照蜂群作为群体进行管理,每年要么对瓦螨进行两次处理(CT),要么不进行处理(CU)。2008 年和 2009 年分别设立了 240 和 247 个初始试验群。关于授粉要求,RHB 和 VSH 蜂群的成虫和幼虫种群通常与标准 CT 组相似。对于 2 月的杏仁授粉[Prunus dulcis(Mill.)D.A.Webb],满足要求的 6 个或更多框成虫的蜂群百分比分别为 57%(VSH)、56%(CT)、39%(RHB)和 34%(CU)。RHB 通常在早春时具有小蜂群,但可以通过适当的喂养来克服。对于 5 月至 7 月的后期授粉要求,四个组中的 94-100%的蜂群都满足了苹果(Malus domestica Borkh.)、蔓越莓(Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton)和低灌木蓝莓(Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton)的授粉规模要求。瓦螨的侵染通常在 CT 群中最低,在 VSH 群中比在 RHB 和 CU 群中倾向于更低。这项研究表明,具有 VSH 特性的蜜蜂和纯俄罗斯蜜蜂为养蜂人提供了替代方案,用于商业作物授粉,同时减少对杀螨剂的依赖。蜂王损失的频率很高(每年只有大约四分之一的原始蜂王存活),这表明需要频繁换王以维持所需的遗传特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验