Bahreini Rassol, Currie Robert W
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2.
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Aug;108(4):1495-505. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov164. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a cooperative breeding program designed to enhance winter survival of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) when exposed to high levels of varroa (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman) in outdoor-wintered and indoor-wintered colonies. Half of the colonies from selected and unselected stocks were randomly assigned to be treated with late autumn oxalic acid treatment or to be left untreated. Colonies were then randomly assigned to be wintered either indoors (n = 37) or outdoors (n = 40). Late autumn treatment with oxalic acid did not improve wintering performance. However, genotype of bees affected colony survival and the proportion of commercially viable colonies in spring, as indicated by greater rates of colony survival and commercially viable colonies for selected stock (43% survived and 33% were viable) in comparison to unselected stock (19% survived and 9% were viable) across all treatment groups. Indoor wintering improved spring bee population score, proportion of colonies surviving, and proportion of commercially viable colonies relative to outdoor wintering (73% of selected stock and 41% of unselected stock survived during indoor wintering). Selected stock showed better "tolerance" to varroa as the selected stock also maintained higher bee populations relative to unselected stock. However, there was no evidence of "resistance" in selected colonies (reduced mite densities). Collectively, this experiment showed that breeding can improve tolerance to varroa and this can help minimize colony loss through winter and improve colony wintering performance. Overall, colony wintering success of both genotypes of bees was better when colonies were wintered indoors than when colonies were wintered outdoors.
本研究的目的是评估一项合作育种计划的有效性,该计划旨在提高室外越冬和室内越冬蜂群中蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)在暴露于高水平瓦螨(狄斯瓦螨)时的冬季存活率。从选定和未选定种群中选取的蜂群,一半被随机分配接受秋末草酸处理,另一半不做处理。然后,蜂群被随机分配在室内(n = 37)或室外(n = 40)越冬。秋末用草酸处理并不能提高越冬性能。然而,蜜蜂的基因型影响蜂群的存活率以及春季商业上可行蜂群的比例,所有处理组中,选定种群的蜂群存活率和商业上可行蜂群的比例更高(43%存活且33%可行),相比之下未选定种群(19%存活且9%可行)。与室外越冬相比,室内越冬提高了春季蜜蜂种群得分、蜂群存活比例以及商业上可行蜂群的比例(室内越冬期间,选定种群的73%和未选定种群的41%存活)。选定种群对瓦螨表现出更好的“耐受性”,因为与未选定种群相比,选定种群的蜜蜂数量也更多。然而,选定蜂群中没有“抗性”的证据(螨虫密度降低)。总体而言,该实验表明育种可以提高对瓦螨的耐受性,这有助于最大限度减少冬季蜂群损失并提高蜂群越冬性能。总的来说,两种基因型蜜蜂的蜂群在室内越冬时的越冬成功率都高于在室外越冬时。