Suppr超能文献

一种用于困难下腔静脉滤器取出的“后备”技术。

A "fall-back" technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrieval.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.063. Epub 2012 May 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the results of an alternative technique for inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval that can be used when the retrieval hook cannot be snared.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients undergoing attempted IVCF retrieval by a single surgeon between March 2009 and March 2011 was undertaken. After December 2009, in cases where the retrieval hook could not be snared, an 18F/85 cm sheath was inserted into the internal jugular vein and a Bentson wire (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) and snare were advanced across separate interstices of the filter. The resulting "lasso" was pulled up below the collar at the top of the filter, and the filter collapsed into the sheath.

RESULTS

Over 28 months, 34 patients underwent attempted retrieval of Günther Tulip filters (Cook Medical). Patients were 44±15 years old; 59% were women (n=20). Filters were placed for venous thromboembolism with contraindication to anticoagulation in seven cases and prophylactically in 27 cases. Of the prophylactic cases, 18 (67%) were placed before planned bariatric surgery. Before December 2009, the success rate was 86% (6 of 7): the retrieval hook of one filter could not be snared and seemed to be embedded in the wall of the cava. After adoption of the described technique, the success rate was 96% (26 of 27): one patient refused further attempts at central venous catheterization after multiple unsuccessful attempts. Filters retrieved conventionally by snaring the hook (n=18) were implanted on average for 4.8±3.7 months and 12.1±10.1 months for those retrieved using the new technique (n=14; P=.02). All patients were discharged on the day of the procedure without complication. The one patient in whom the retrieval hook could not be snared before December 2009 has refused another attempt at retrieval.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of IVCF retrieval described here was successful in every instance in which it was attempted. It was associated with no morbidity despite the customary use of an 18F sheath in the internal jugular vein. The approach constitutes an appropriate "fall-back" technique when the retrieval hook of a removable IVCF cannot be snared.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一种下腔静脉滤器(IVCF)取栓的替代技术,当取栓钩无法套取时,可以使用该技术。

方法

回顾性分析 2009 年 3 月至 2011 年 3 月期间由同一位外科医生尝试进行的所有 IVCF 取栓患者的临床资料。2009 年 12 月后,对于取栓钩无法套取的病例,将 18F/85cm 鞘插入颈内静脉,并将 Bentson 导丝(库克医疗,印第安纳州布卢明顿)和套圈穿过滤器的间隔推进。形成的“套索”被拉到滤器顶部的领下,滤器则坍塌到鞘内。

结果

在 28 个月的时间里,34 例 Günther Tulip 滤器(库克医疗)患者接受了取栓尝试。患者年龄 44±15 岁;59%为女性(n=20)。7 例因静脉血栓栓塞伴抗凝禁忌而放置滤器,27 例预防性放置。在预防性放置的病例中,18 例(67%)在计划减重手术前放置。2009 年 12 月前,成功率为 86%(7 例中的 6 例):一个滤器的取栓钩无法套取,似乎嵌入了腔静脉壁。采用描述的技术后,成功率为 96%(27 例中的 26 例):1 例患者在多次尝试失败后拒绝进一步尝试中心静脉置管。通过套取钩常规取栓(n=18)的滤器平均植入 4.8±3.7 个月,而使用新技术(n=14)取栓的滤器平均植入 12.1±10.1 个月(P=.02)。所有患者均在手术当天出院,无并发症。2009 年 12 月前无法套取取栓钩的患者拒绝再次尝试取栓。

结论

本文描述的 IVCF 取栓方法在尝试的所有情况下均获得成功。尽管常规使用 18F 颈内静脉鞘,但并未出现任何并发症。当可移除的 IVCF 取栓钩无法套取时,该方法是一种合适的“备用”技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验