Clinical Immunology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320‐1799, United States.
J Immunol Methods. 2012 Aug 31;382(1-2):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 May 15.
Allotypes of IgG1 molecules can influence the immunogenicity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and may account for the presence of some pre-existing antibodies. An electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to characterize the binding epitopes of anti-therapeutic antibodies (ATAs) in a Phase 1 single ascending dose clinical trial of a therapeutic aglycosylated IgG1monoclonal antibody (mAb). There was no evidence for ATAs specific for a possible neo-epitope created due to the lack of glycosylation. ATAs that developed post-treatment were specific for the F(ab')2, whereas, pre-existing ATAs were specific to the Fc region. Further characterization of the pre-existing ATAs identified the specific epitope to be the G1m1 allotype determinant in the Fc of the therapeutic. A novel competitive bridging assay was developed to verify that serum IgG1 from subjects with pre-existing anti-G1m1 antibodies was homozygous for the antithetical allotype (G1m3). The endogenous G1m allotype of all subjects was assessed and correlation to ATA incidence and adverse events was evaluated. Interestingly, the pre-existing anti-allotype antibody in subjects persisted but was not augmented after dosing, indicating the lack of a secondary immune response to this epitope. These studies indicate the relationship of the therapeutic allotype and the corresponding allotype of subjects is an important component to further understand the impact of immunogenicity on the safety and efficacy of therapeutic antibodies.
IgG1 分子的同种异型可以影响治疗性单克隆抗体的免疫原性,并且可能是某些预先存在的抗体存在的原因。在治疗性去糖基化 IgG1 单克隆抗体 (mAb) 的 1 期单次递增剂量临床试验中,使用电化学发光 (ECL) 桥联免疫分析来表征抗治疗性抗体 (ATA) 的结合表位。没有证据表明存在针对由于缺乏糖基化而产生的新表位的 ATA。治疗后产生的 ATA 特异性针对 F(ab')2,而预先存在的 ATA 特异性针对 Fc 区域。对预先存在的 ATA 的进一步表征确定了特定的表位是治疗性的 Fc 中的 G1m1 同种异型决定簇。开发了一种新型竞争桥接测定法来验证具有预先存在的抗-G1m1 抗体的受试者的血清 IgG1 是对偶同种异型 (G1m3) 的纯合子。评估了所有受试者的内源性 G1m 同种异型,并评估了其与 ATA 发生率和不良事件的相关性。有趣的是,受试者中预先存在的抗同种异型抗体持续存在,但在给药后并未增强,表明对该表位没有二次免疫反应。这些研究表明,治疗性同种异型和受试者相应同种异型的关系是进一步了解免疫原性对治疗性抗体安全性和疗效的影响的重要组成部分。