Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Clin Biochem. 2012 Nov;45(16-17):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 May 17.
To assess the merit of a novel single-epitope sandwich (SES) assay specific to the stable part of BNP in patients with reversible myocardial ischemia as post-translational modifications of BNP may influence assay performance.
We measured BNP concentration by a conventional assay and the SES-BNP assay in 198 patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). BNP concentration was determined before and immediately after exercise stress testing, and 1.5 and 4.5h later. Patients were categorized according to MPI results.
BNP concentration was higher with both assays at all time points in patients with reversible myocardial ischemia (n=19) compared to the other patients (n=179). Measuring BNP after stress testing or calculating the changes in BNP concentration did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared to baseline measurements: SES-BNP: AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.58-0.84) vs. conventional BNP: 0.71 (0.59-0.83), p=0.96. By linear regression analysis, reversible myocardial ischemia was significantly associated with baseline SES-BNP concentration (p=0.043), but not with measurements by the conventional assay (p=0.089). In multivariate logistic regression models, only baseline measurement with the SES-BNP assay was significantly associated with reversible myocardial ischemia: odds ratio [logarithmical transformed BNP] 2.00 (95% CI 1.16-3.47), p=0.013. The SES-BNP assay, but not the conventional BNP assay, reclassified a significant proportion of the patients towards their correct category on top of the best clinical model of our data set: NRI=0.47, p=0.04.
The SES-BNP assay was significantly associated with reversible myocardial ischemia as assessed by several statistical indices, while a conventional BNP assay was not.
评估一种新型的单表位夹心(SES)检测方法在可逆转性心肌缺血患者中的应用价值,因为 BNP 的翻译后修饰可能会影响检测结果。
我们在 198 名因心肌灌注成像(MPI)而就诊的患者中,分别使用常规检测方法和 SES-BNP 检测方法检测 BNP 浓度。在运动应激试验前、运动后即刻以及 1.5 和 4.5 小时后,我们测定了 BNP 浓度。我们根据 MPI 结果对患者进行了分类。
与其他患者(179 名)相比,在有可逆转性心肌缺血的患者(19 名)中,在所有时间点,两种检测方法均检测到了更高浓度的 BNP。与基线测量相比,在应激后测量 BNP 或计算 BNP 浓度的变化并未提高诊断准确性:SES-BNP:AUC 0.71(95% CI 0.58-0.84)vs. 常规 BNP:0.71(0.59-0.83),p=0.96。通过线性回归分析,可逆转性心肌缺血与 SES-BNP 检测的基线浓度显著相关(p=0.043),但与常规检测方法无显著相关(p=0.089)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,只有 SES-BNP 检测的基线测量与可逆转性心肌缺血显著相关:优势比(对数化 BNP)2.00(95% CI 1.16-3.47),p=0.013。SES-BNP 检测方法,而不是常规 BNP 检测方法,可将相当一部分患者根据我们数据集的最佳临床模型重新归类到正确的类别:NRI=0.47,p=0.04。
SES-BNP 检测方法与可逆转性心肌缺血显著相关,而常规 BNP 检测方法则不然。