Department of Anesthesiology, The State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):402-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318257a0f2. Epub 2012 May 18.
The impact of delays in extubation on operating room (OR) workflow are challenging to assess because such delays may or may not be a bottleneck to the patient leaving the OR. We developed an observational measure that quantifies the influence of extubation times on OR workflow.
The time from dressing on the patient (or its functional equivalent) to tracheal extubation was observed in ORs, among a cohort of adult patients undergoing elective (scheduled) general anesthesia. During the first 36 extubations, the measure was developed using qualitative methods. During the subsequent 64 extubations, qualitative observation was supplemented with quantitative measurement. Interrater reliability was assessed during the final 30 of the 64 extubations. Video 1 (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/AA/A396) shows animation of a typical observation period.
The developed measure was a single value for each case: whether at least 1 person was doing no visible physical activity potentially related to patient care for at least 1 minute between dressing on the patient and tracheal extubation. Assessing reliability, 2 raters' listings of cases with no versus 1 or more people idle were identical for 30 of 30 cases (95% lower confidence limit >90%). Spearman r = 0.99 (95% lower confidence limit 0.99) for time from dressing on patient to extubation. Predictive validity was shown by positive correlation between the percentage of cases with at least 1 person idle and extubation time (P < 0.0001): 21% for <5 minutes, 42% for 5 to 10 minutes, 87% for 10 to 15 minutes, and 100% for >15 minutes.
Longer times to extubation are associated with an increased chance of at least 1 person waiting in the OR. This measure can be used in observational studies and for lean engineering projects to assess conditions when time to extubation affects workflow. Observers can combine use of this measure for extubation times with the previously developed measure for studying the influence of induction times on OR workflow.
评估拔管延迟对手术室(OR)工作流程的影响具有挑战性,因为这种延迟可能是或可能不是患者离开 OR 的瓶颈。我们开发了一种观察性测量方法,量化了拔管时间对 OR 工作流程的影响。
在接受择期(计划)全身麻醉的成年患者的 OR 中,观察从患者穿衣(或其功能等效物)到气管拔管的时间。在前 36 次拔管过程中,使用定性方法开发了该测量方法。在后 64 次拔管过程中,定性观察辅以定量测量。在最后 30 次拔管中的 64 次拔管中评估了观察者间的可靠性。视频 1(见补充数字内容 1,http://links.lww.com/AA/A396)显示了一个典型观察期的动画。
开发的测量方法是每个病例的单个值:在给患者穿衣和气管拔管之间,是否至少有 1 人至少 1 分钟没有进行任何潜在与患者护理相关的可见身体活动。评估可靠性时,2 名观察者对 30 例中有 0 例或 1 例以上人员空闲的病例的清单完全相同(95%置信下限>90%)。从给患者穿衣到拔管的时间,2 名观察者的 Spearman r = 0.99(95%置信下限 0.99)。有效性通过至少 1 人空闲的病例百分比与拔管时间之间的正相关关系得到证明(P<0.0001):<5 分钟为 21%,5 至 10 分钟为 42%,10 至 15 分钟为 87%,>15 分钟为 100%。
拔管时间延长与至少 1 人在 OR 中等待的机会增加相关。该测量方法可用于观察性研究和精益工程项目,以评估拔管时间影响工作流程的情况。观察者可以将这种拔管时间测量方法与之前开发的用于研究诱导时间对 OR 工作流程影响的测量方法结合使用。