Suppr超能文献

C2椎弓根螺钉与经关节螺钉的螺钉位置不良及椎动脉损伤比较:Meta分析与文献综述

Comparison of screw malposition and vertebral artery injury of C2 pedicle and transarticular screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature.

作者信息

Elliott Robert E, Tanweer Omar, Boah Akwasi, Morsi Amr, Ma Tracy, Frempong-Boadu Anthony, Smith Michael L

机构信息

*Neurosurgical Care, LLC, Royersford, PA †Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, Bellevue Hospital ‡New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Aug;27(6):305-15. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825d5daa.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of screw malposition and vertebral artery injury (VAI) with transarticular screws (TAS) and C2 pedicle screws (C2PS) using meta-analysis techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior instrumentation for atlantoaxial fusions can be challenging and risky. Some centers report a higher incidence of VAI with the implantation of TAS compared with C2PS, whereas other data do not support this.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for English language articles between 1994 and April 2011 describing the clinical and radiographic outcomes after insertion of C2PS or TAS. Forty-one studies reporting on 3627 TAS and 33 studies describing 2979 C2PS met inclusion criteria for VAI or clinically significant misplacements (VAI, neurological deficits, or misplacements requiring surgical revision), and 36 studies reporting on 3280 TAS and 28 studies describing 2532 C2PS met inclusion criteria for radiographic misplacement outcomes.

RESULTS

All studies comprised class III evidence. VAI occurred in 26 of 3627 (0.72%) implanted TAS and in 10 of 2979 (0.34%) implanted C2PS (P=0.01). Clinically significant misplacements occurred in 67 TAS (1.84%) and in 10 C2PS (0.34%; P<0.0001). The point estimate of VAI for TAS was 1.68% [confidence interval (CI), 1.23%-2.29%] and was higher than C2PS (1.09%; CI, 0.73%-1.63%; P=0.01). The point estimate of clinically significant screw malposition for TAS was 2.33% (CI, 1.61%-3.37%) and was higher than that of C2PS (1.15%; CI, 0.77%-1.70%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

With training, experience, and anatomic knowledge, both TAS and C2PS can be inserted accurately and safely. However, improper insertion and VAI can have catastrophic consequences. Our review identified a higher risk of VAI, neurological injury, and clinically significant malpositions with TAS compared with C2PS. These data provide preliminary support for the supposition that C2PS have a lower risk of morbidity.

摘要

研究设计

文献综述与荟萃分析。

目的

运用荟萃分析技术比较经关节螺钉(TAS)和C2椎弓根螺钉(C2PS)置入时螺钉位置不当及椎动脉损伤(VAI)的发生率。

背景资料总结

寰枢椎融合的后路内固定术具有挑战性且存在风险。一些中心报告称,与C2PS相比,TAS植入时VAI的发生率更高,而其他数据并不支持这一观点。

方法

检索在线数据库,查找1994年至2011年4月间描述C2PS或TAS置入后临床和影像学结果的英文文章。41项报告3627枚TAS的研究以及33项描述2979枚C2PS的研究符合VAI或具有临床意义的位置不当(VAI、神经功能缺损或需要手术翻修的位置不当)的纳入标准,36项报告3280枚TAS的研究以及28项描述2532枚C2PS的研究符合影像学位置不当结果的纳入标准。

结果

所有研究均为Ⅲ级证据。3627枚植入的TAS中有26枚(0.72%)发生VAI,2979枚植入的C2PS中有10枚(0.34%)发生VAI(P = 0.01)。具有临床意义的位置不当在TAS中有67枚(1.84%),在C2PS中有10枚(0.34%;P < 0.0001)。TAS发生VAI的点估计值为1.68% [置信区间(CI),1.23% - 2.29%],高于C2PS(1.09%;CI,0.73% - 1.63%;P = 0.01)。TAS具有临床意义的螺钉位置不当的点估计值为2.33%(CI,1.61% - 3.37%),高于C2PS(1.15%;CI,0.77% - 1.70%;P < 0.001)。

结论

通过培训、经验和解剖学知识,TAS和C2PS均可准确、安全地置入。然而,置入不当和VAI可能会带来灾难性后果。我们的综述发现,与C2PS相比,TAS发生VAI、神经损伤和具有临床意义的位置不当的风险更高。这些数据为C2PS发病风险较低的假设提供了初步支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验