School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun;57(2):138-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01682.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strengths between dentine and resin composite obtained after Er:YAG laser treatment of crown or root dentine used together with self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
One etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond, 3M, USA) and one self-etch system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, Japan) were applied to root and crown dentine prepared with a regular bur in a turbine or with an Er:YAG laser. The shear bond strength was determined after thermocycling and statistically analysed using independent t-tests.
Crown sites bonded using Clearfil SE Bond and Single Bond adhesives yielded bond strengths similar to that of root dentine sites (p > 0.05). Clearfil SE Bond was stronger in both the lased and non-lased groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength was obtained when Single Bond without acid etching was used on Er:YAG ablated dentine. When total-etch adhesive was used, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the laser-ablated and laser-ablated/acid-etched and bur-cut/acid-etched groups.
Er:YAG laser irradiation of root and crown dentine conducted prior to the adhesive protocol adversely affected adhesion and decreased bond strength compared with traditional preparation.
本研究旨在评估 Er:YAG 激光处理牙冠或牙根牙本质后,与自酸蚀和全酸蚀粘接系统一起获得的牙本质与树脂复合材料之间的粘结强度。
采用常规涡轮手机或 Er:YAG 激光制备牙本质后,在根面和牙冠面分别应用 1 种全酸蚀粘接剂(Single Bond,3M,美国)和 1 种自酸蚀粘接剂(Clearfil SE Bond,Kuraray,日本)。经热循环处理后测定剪切粘结强度,并采用独立 t 检验进行统计学分析。
使用 Clearfil SE Bond 和 Single Bond 粘接剂粘结牙冠牙本质的粘结强度与根面牙本质相似(p>0.05)。在激光处理和非激光处理组中,Clearfil SE Bond 的粘结强度均更强(p<0.05)。未进行酸蚀处理的情况下,Single Bond 在 Er:YAG 激光处理牙本质时粘结强度最低。当使用全酸蚀粘接剂时,激光处理组、激光处理/酸蚀组和涡轮手机切割/酸蚀组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。
与传统牙本质预备方法相比,在使用粘接剂之前,Er:YAG 激光对牙冠和牙根牙本质的照射会对牙本质的粘结产生不利影响,降低粘结强度。