Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jul;73(4):570-80. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.570.
Experiences of racial/ethnic bias and unfair treatment are risk factors for alcohol problems, and population differences in exposure to these social adversities (i.e., differential exposure) may contribute to alcohol-related disparities. Differential vulnerability is another plausible mechanism underlying health disparities, yet few studies have examined whether populations differ in their vulnerability to the effects of social adversity on psychological stress and the effects of psychological stress on alcohol problems.
Data from the 2005 U.S. National Alcohol Survey (N = 4,080 adult drinkers) were analyzed using structural equation modeling to assess an overall model of pathways linking social adversity, depressive symptoms, heavy drinking, and alcohol dependence. Multiple group analyses were conducted to assess differences in the model's relationships among Blacks versus Whites, Hispanics versus Whites, and the poor (income below the federal poverty line) versus non-poor (income above the poverty line).
The overall model explained 48% of the variance in alcohol dependence and revealed significant pathways between social adversity and alcohol dependence involving depressive symptoms and heavy drinking. The effects of social adversity and depressive symptoms were no different among Blacks and Hispanics compared with Whites. However, the poor (vs. non-poor) showed stronger associations between unfair treatment and depressive symptoms and between depressive symptoms and heavy drinking.
Contrary to some prior studies, these findings suggest that racial disparities in alcohol problems may be more a function of racial/ethnic minorities' greater exposure, rather than vulnerability, to chronic stressors such as social adversity. However, observed differences between the poor and non-poor imply that differential vulnerability contributes to socioeconomic disparities in alcohol problems. Efforts to reduce both differential exposure and vulnerability might help to mitigate these disparities.
经历种族/民族偏见和不公平待遇是出现酒精问题的风险因素,而不同人群接触这些社会逆境(即差异暴露)的情况可能导致与酒精相关的差异。易损性差异是造成健康差异的另一个合理机制,但很少有研究探讨不同人群对社会逆境对心理压力的影响以及心理压力对酒精问题的影响的易损性是否存在差异。
利用结构方程模型分析了 2005 年美国全国酒精调查(N=4080 名成年饮酒者)的数据,以评估社会逆境、抑郁症状、重度饮酒和酒精依赖之间关联的总体模型。进行了多群组分析,以评估该模型在黑人和白人、西班牙裔人和白人和穷人和非穷人(收入高于贫困线)之间的关系差异。
总体模型解释了酒精依赖的 48%的方差,揭示了社会逆境与酒精依赖之间存在显著关联,涉及抑郁症状和重度饮酒。与白人相比,黑人及西班牙裔人群中社会逆境和抑郁症状对酒精依赖的影响没有差异。然而,与非贫困人口相比,贫困人口在不公正待遇和抑郁症状之间以及抑郁症状和重度饮酒之间表现出更强的关联。
与一些先前的研究相反,这些发现表明,酒精问题方面的种族差异可能更多是由于少数族裔接触到更多慢性压力源(如社会逆境),而不是易损性。然而,在贫困人口和非贫困人口之间观察到的差异意味着易损性差异导致了酒精问题在社会经济方面的差异。减少差异暴露和易损性的努力可能有助于缓解这些差异。