Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Affiliate of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Curr Eye Res. 2012 Aug;37(8):661-70. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.675616. Epub 2012 May 25.
To evaluate the therapeutic effect and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (RBZ) or RBZ combined with focal/grid laser in diabetic macular edema (DME).
Systematic review of randomized clinical control trials (RCCTs) comparing RBZ or RBZ combined with focal/grid laser to non-drug control or focal/grid laser in DME was performed.
The RCCTs in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED, EMBASE, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were included. The means and standard deviations of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were extracted at 12 or 24 months. Data regarding complications were collected. The Review Manager 5.1.2 was used.
Four trials with a total of 1313 DME patients were included. Our analysis showed that intravitreal RBZ appeared to be superior to non-drug therapy in reducing CMT (12 months, p = 0.02), and improving BCVA with statistical significance (12 months, p = 0.0003). RBZ combined with focal/grid laser experienced statistically significant reduction in CMT (12 months, p = 0.01), and improvement in BCVA (12 months, p < 0.00001; 24 months, p = 0.007) compared with focal/grid laser. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) had no statistical difference between RBZ monotherapy or RBZ combined with laser and the noninvasive interventions. The improvement in BCVA and CMT from the RBZ and RBZ plus laser arms both had no statistically significant difference. While the mean number of intravitreal injections needed was lower in RBZ plus laser arm than RBZ arm at the end of 24 months.
Our analysis shows that RBZ and RBZ combined with focal/grid laser is more advantageous than non-drug treatment or focal/grid laser in reducing CMT and improving BCVA in DME during 12 and 24 months follow-up period and can be well tolerated based on the safety assessment. Intravitreal RBZ may be equivalent to RBZ combined with focal/grid laser.
评估玻璃体内雷珠单抗(RBZ)或 RBZ 联合局部/格栅激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效和安全性。
系统评价比较 RBZ 或 RBZ 联合局部/格栅激光与 DME 中的非药物治疗或局部/格栅激光的随机对照临床试验(RCCT)。
纳入 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、EMBASE、对照试验注册库和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中的 RCCT。从基线开始,在 12 或 24 个月时提取最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)的变化均值和标准差。收集有关并发症的数据。使用 Review Manager 5.1.2 进行分析。
纳入 4 项共 1313 例 DME 患者的试验。我们的分析表明,玻璃体内 RBZ 在降低 CMT 方面似乎优于非药物治疗(12 个月,p = 0.02),并具有统计学意义上的 BCVA 改善(12 个月,p = 0.0003)。与局部/格栅激光相比,RBZ 联合局部/格栅激光在 12 个月时 CMT 显著降低(p = 0.01),BCVA 显著改善(12 个月,p < 0.00001;24 个月,p = 0.007)。RBZ 单药治疗或 RBZ 联合激光与非侵入性干预的不良事件(AE)发生率无统计学差异。RBZ 和 RBZ 联合激光组的 BCVA 和 CMT 改善均无统计学差异。然而,在 24 个月时,RBZ 联合激光组所需的玻璃体内注射次数均值低于 RBZ 组。
我们的分析表明,在 12 和 24 个月的随访期间,与非药物治疗或局部/格栅激光相比,RBZ 和 RBZ 联合局部/格栅激光在降低 CMT 和改善 DME 中的 BCVA 方面更具优势,且基于安全性评估,可良好耐受。玻璃体内 RBZ 可能与 RBZ 联合局部/格栅激光等效。