Amirjani Nasim, Kiernan Matthew C, McKenzie David K, Butler Jane E, Gandevia Simon C
Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012 Oct;13(6):521-7. doi: 10.3109/17482968.2012.673169. Epub 2012 May 28.
Respiratory pacing has advanced the long-term management of respiratory failure secondary to neurological disorders. It has an established role in curtailing invasive mechanical ventilation after upper motor neuron lesions such as spinal cord injury. There is increasing interest to expand the application of intramuscular diaphragm pacing to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease. Although diaphragm pacing has been offered to ALS patients, evidence-based data to determine its benefits remain lacking. The limited current literature indicates progression of respiratory dysfunction in ALS patients despite diaphragm pacing. The data from clinical trials are inadequate to substantiate its survival and sleep benefits. Its advantages over non-invasive mechanical ventilation have not been directly investigated. Furthermore, there are cautions for ALS patients to consider when opting for diaphragm pacing. Progressive degeneration of the phrenic motor neurons in classic ALS will interrupt the transmission of pacer signals to sustain diaphragm contractions. Pacing protocols that are safe for other neurological conditions may be detrimental for ALS, at least as suggested by transgenic animal models. Issues inherent to the device warrant expert intervention in implanted patients. At present, clinical effectiveness and long-term safety concerns about diaphragm pacing in ALS remain to be addressed.
呼吸起搏技术推动了继发于神经系统疾病的呼吸衰竭的长期管理。它在减少诸如脊髓损伤等上运动神经元损伤后的有创机械通气方面已确立了作用。人们越来越有兴趣将肌内膈起搏技术的应用扩展到肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS),这是一种进行性致命的神经退行性疾病。尽管已为ALS患者提供了膈起搏治疗,但仍缺乏确定其益处的循证数据。目前有限的文献表明,尽管进行了膈起搏治疗,ALS患者的呼吸功能障碍仍在进展。临床试验数据不足以证实其对生存和睡眠的益处。尚未直接研究其相对于无创机械通气的优势。此外,ALS患者在选择膈起搏时需要考虑一些注意事项。经典ALS中膈运动神经元的进行性退化会中断起搏器信号的传递,从而无法维持膈肌收缩。至少从转基因动物模型来看,对其他神经系统疾病安全的起搏方案可能对ALS有害。该设备固有的问题需要专家对植入患者进行干预。目前,ALS患者膈起搏的临床有效性和长期安全性问题仍有待解决。