Suppr超能文献

系统综述肠易激综合征的诊断标准表明罗马 III 标准的效度和实用性均较差。

Systematic review of diagnostic criteria for IBS demonstrates poor validity and utilization of Rome III.

机构信息

GI Motility Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Sep;24(9):853-e397. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01943.x. Epub 2012 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the absence of a clear biomarker for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), clinical criteria are used. In this study, we conduct a systematic review to examine the validation and utilization of IBS criteria.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in two stages. The first was a review of literature from 1978 validating IBS diagnostic criteria. The second stage of review was to select studies published in IBS between 1992 and 2011. This time period was divided into three segments (Rome I era from 1992 to 1999, Rome II era from 2000 to 2006, and Rome III era from 2007 to 2011). The number and type of study (RCT or other) and criteria used were evaluated for each era.

KEY RESULTS

The first stage of the systematic review identified only 14 published studies validating diagnostic tests for IBS (with three studies evaluating more than one criterion). There were eight validations for Manning, three validations for Kruis, four validations for Rome I, three validations for Rome II, and no validation for Rome III. In the second review of utilization of Rome criteria, only 25.7% of published IBS papers used Rome III criteria during the Rome III era (Rome II was used most in 64.8% of studies).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This review identified that comparator groups varied widely between studies making comparison of criteria impossible. Manning criteria are the most valid and accurate criteria. More importantly, Rome III is not validated and is poorly adopted in clinical research trial enrollment.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏明确的肠易激综合征(IBS)生物标志物,因此使用临床标准。本研究通过系统评价来检查 IBS 标准的验证和应用。

方法

分两个阶段进行系统评价。第一阶段是对 1978 年以来验证 IBS 诊断标准的文献进行综述。第二阶段是选择 1992 年至 2011 年间发表的 IBS 研究。将这一时期分为三个阶段(Rome I 时代:1992 年至 1999 年;Rome II 时代:2000 年至 2006 年;Rome III 时代:2007 年至 2011 年)。对每个时代的研究数量和类型(RCT 或其他)以及使用的标准进行评估。

主要结果

第一阶段系统评价仅确定了 14 项发表的研究,这些研究验证了 IBS 的诊断检测方法(其中 3 项研究评估了不止一个标准)。有 8 项验证用于 Manning 标准,3 项验证用于 Kruis 标准,4 项验证用于 Rome I 标准,3 项验证用于 Rome II 标准,而 Rome III 标准没有验证。在对 Rome 标准的应用进行的第二次回顾中,在 Rome III 时代,只有 25.7%的发表的 IBS 论文使用 Rome III 标准(Rome II 标准在 64.8%的研究中最常用)。

结论和推论

本综述发现,各研究之间的对照组差异很大,使得无法对标准进行比较。Manning 标准是最有效和准确的标准。更重要的是,Rome III 标准未被验证,在临床研究试验入组中应用不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验