Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):695-701. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.054. Epub 2012 May 25.
The present study assessed the effect of age and co-morbidity on the outcomes of mild, moderate, and severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients aged >60 years during 18 years of follow-up. The outcomes evaluated were hemodynamic progression, a composite cardiac mortality or aortic valve replacement (AVR) end point, and all-cause mortality. Consecutive Department of Veterans Affairs patients (aged >60 years) with AS were prospectively enrolled from 1988 to 1994 and followed until 2008 (n = 239). The baseline demographic, co-morbidity, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded. At enrollment, the mean age was 74 ± 6 years, and 78% were men. The annualized mean aortic valve gradient progression was 4 ± 4, 6 ± 5, and 10 ± 8 mm Hg for mild, moderate, and severe AS, respectively (p <0.001). During a mean follow-up of 8 ± 5 years, 206 deaths (52% cardiac) and 91 AVRs were recorded. The AVR/cardiac mortality event rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 2%, 26%, and 50% for mild AS, 13%, 63%, and 69% for moderate AS, and 66%, 95%, and 95% for severe AS (p <0.001). During the study period, 132 patients developed severe AS. The survival rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 60 ± 7%, 14 ± 5%, and 5 ± 3% with conservative management and 98 ± 2%, 82 ± 4%, and 50 ± 5% after AVR, respectively (p <0.001). The independent predictors of all-cause mortality were the age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index (hazard ratio 1.24, p <0.001), AVR (hazard ratio 0.40, p <0.001), and grade of left ventricular dysfunction (hazard ratio 1.36, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the prognostic significance of AS is determined by the hemodynamic severity, left ventricular function, and the presence of symptoms, in the context of age and co-morbidities. The age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index provides crucial prognostic information to guide the surgical risk/benefit discussions for patients with severe AS.
本研究评估了年龄和合并症对 18 年随访中 >60 岁的轻度、中度和重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者结局的影响。评估的结局包括血流动力学进展、心脏死亡或主动脉瓣置换(AVR)复合终点以及全因死亡率。连续的退伍军人事务部患者(>60 岁)从 1988 年至 1994 年前瞻性纳入,并随访至 2008 年(n = 239)。记录基线人口统计学、合并症和超声心动图参数。入组时,平均年龄为 74 ± 6 岁,78%为男性。轻度、中度和重度 AS 的平均每年主动脉瓣梯度进展分别为 4 ± 4、6 ± 5 和 10 ± 8 mmHg(p <0.001)。在平均 8 ± 5 年的随访中,记录了 206 例死亡(52%为心脏性)和 91 例 AVR。轻度 AS 的 AVR/心脏死亡率事件率在 1、5 和 10 年时分别为 2%、26%和 50%,中度 AS 为 13%、63%和 69%,重度 AS 为 66%、95%和 95%(p <0.001)。在研究期间,132 例患者发展为重度 AS。保守治疗的 1、5 和 10 年生存率分别为 60 ± 7%、14 ± 5%和 5 ± 3%,AVR 后的生存率分别为 98 ± 2%、82 ± 4%和 50 ± 5%(p <0.001)。全因死亡率的独立预测因素是年龄调整后的 Charlson 合并症指数(风险比 1.24,p <0.001)、AVR(风险比 0.40,p <0.001)和左心室功能障碍分级(风险比 1.36,p = 0.01)。总之,在年龄和合并症的背景下,AS 的预后意义取决于血流动力学严重程度、左心室功能和症状的存在。年龄调整后的 Charlson 合并症指数为指导严重 AS 患者的手术风险/获益讨论提供了关键的预后信息。