Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 May 18.
The schedule for intravesical chemotherapy administration has not been definitively established in patients with low-grade recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
To assess both the feasibility and the efficacy of a short-term intensive schedule of neoadjuvant intravesical chemotherapy in patients with recurrent NMIBC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomised phase 2 clinical study included 54 patients with recurrent NMIBC who were submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy intravesical instillations according to two different timing schedules. The study was performed at a tertiary care referral centre.
Intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) 40 mg/40 ml was administered according to a schedule of either one instillation per week for 6 wk (group 1) or three instillations per week for 2 wk (group 2) prior to transurethral resection (TUR).
Local and systemic toxicity were investigated using the US National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0 questionnaire at each instillation and the SF-36 questionnaire at randomisation and before TUR. A video-recorded cystoscopy and TUR were performed within 14 d after treatment completion.
Groups 1 and 2 each were assigned 27 cases. Two patients (7.4%) in group 2 could not complete the scheduled treatment because of severe lower urinary tract symptoms. No statistically significant difference in SF-36 domain score was documented pre- and post-treatment between groups. Likewise, no statistically significant difference in treatment-related toxicity according to the CTCAE v.4 questionnaire was registered. Twelve patients (44.4%) in group 1 and 19 patients (70.4%) in group 2 (p=0.054) had complete tumour response. The small number of patients included represents the main limitation of the study.
The intensive short-term schedule of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and without additional toxicity compared with the weekly regimen. The increased ablative effect may be explained by the improved adherence of the scheduled timing to the duplication rate of tumour cells.
在低级别复发性非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者中,膀胱内化疗的给药方案尚未明确。
评估新辅助膀胱内化疗短期强化方案在复发性 NMIBC 患者中的可行性和疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机 2 期临床研究,纳入了 54 例复发性 NMIBC 患者,他们接受了两种不同时间安排的新辅助膀胱内化疗。该研究在一家三级转诊中心进行。
膀胱内丝裂霉素 C(MMC)40mg/40ml 按照每周一次灌注 6 周(第 1 组)或每周三次灌注 2 周(第 2 组)的方案,在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TUR)前进行。
采用美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)v.4.0 问卷,在每次灌注时以及在随机分组和 TUR 前使用 SF-36 问卷评估局部和全身毒性。治疗完成后 14 天内进行视频记录膀胱镜检查和 TUR。
第 1 组和第 2 组各有 27 例患者。第 2 组的 2 名患者(7.4%)因严重下尿路症状而无法完成计划的治疗。治疗前后,两组间 SF-36 各领域评分均无统计学差异。同样,根据 CTCAE v.4 问卷,两组间治疗相关毒性也无统计学差异。第 1 组的 12 例患者(44.4%)和第 2 组的 19 例患者(70.4%)(p=0.054)完全肿瘤缓解。研究的主要局限性是纳入的患者数量较少。
与每周方案相比,新辅助化疗短期强化方案安全且无额外毒性。预定时间安排与肿瘤细胞倍增率的改善一致性可能解释了消融效果的增加。