School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):646-54. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.46. Epub 2012 May 29.
Systematic review.
Review the use of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) within the context of spinal cord injury (SCI).
A systematic search was conducted to identify SCI-related publications that contained any of the following preference-based HRQoL instruments: 15D, Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-4D, AQoL-6D, EQ-5D, EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index (HUI)-2, HUI-3, Quality of Well-Being Scale Self-Administered (QWB-SA), SF-6D(SF-36) or SF-6D(SF-12). In addition to providing an overview of how different preference-based measures have been adopted in SCI research to-date, a focus of evaluation was to collate and appraise evidence for measurement properties and identify knowledge gaps.
Twenty-two articles were identified. No studies have used preference-based measures in their conventional form, that is, to calculate quality-adjusted life years using patient-level data. Eleven papers reported mean utility scores (across six different instruments). Directly comparable data exists for only one SCI-specific sample, which showed variation across EQ-5D (0.63), HUI-2 (0.81) and HUI-3 (0.68) index scores. Indirect comparisons suggested differences between QWB-SA and SF-6D index scores within tetraplegic and paraplegic patient groups. Only the QWB-SA and SF-6D have undergone (partial) psychometric evaluation, with the respective authors concluding that the measures have potential for SCI research.
Despite 'cost-effectiveness' being an increasingly important consideration for decision makers in all areas of health care, there is a distinct lack of conceptual or empirical research regarding the appropriateness of alternative preference-based HRQoL measures for SCI populations. Given the support for economic evaluation within a cost-utility framework and the paucity of psychometric evidence regarding current instruments, further research is needed.
系统评价。
回顾在脊髓损伤 (SCI) 背景下使用通用偏好健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL) 测量方法的情况。
进行了系统检索,以确定包含以下任何一种偏好 HRQoL 工具的 SCI 相关出版物:15D、生活质量评估 (AQoL)-4D、AQoL-6D、EQ-5D、EQ-5D-5L、健康效用指数 (HUI)-2、HUI-3、健康福利量表自我评估 (QWB-SA)、SF-6D(SF-36) 或 SF-6D(SF-12)。除了提供对迄今为止不同偏好测量方法在 SCI 研究中的应用情况的概述外,评估的重点还包括整理和评估测量特性的证据,并确定知识空白。
确定了 22 篇文章。没有研究以常规形式使用偏好测量方法,即使用患者水平数据计算质量调整生命年。11 篇论文报告了平均效用评分(使用六种不同仪器)。只有一个特定于 SCI 的样本存在直接可比的数据,EQ-5D(0.63)、HUI-2(0.81)和 HUI-3(0.68)指数得分存在差异。间接比较表明,四肢瘫痪和截瘫患者组内 QWB-SA 和 SF-6D 指数得分存在差异。只有 QWB-SA 和 SF-6D 进行了(部分)心理测量评估,各自的作者得出结论,这些测量方法具有用于 SCI 研究的潜力。
尽管“成本效益”在医疗保健的所有领域对决策者来说变得越来越重要,但关于替代偏好 HRQoL 测量方法是否适合 SCI 人群的概念或实证研究明显缺乏。鉴于在成本效用框架内对经济评估的支持以及当前仪器缺乏心理测量证据,需要进一步研究。