Räsänen Pirjo, Roine Eija, Sintonen Harri, Semberg-Konttinen Virpi, Ryynänen Olli-Pekka, Roine Risto
Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital Group, P.O. Box 100, 00029 HUS, Finland.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Spring;22(2):235-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306051051.
The objectives of this study were to identify, in a systematic literature review, published studies having used quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) based on actual measurements of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to determine which HRQoL instruments have been used to calculate QALYs. Furthermore, the aims were to characterize studies with regard to medical specialty, intervention studied, results obtained, quality, country of origin, QALY gain observed, and interpretation of results regarding cost-effectiveness.
Systematic searches of the literature were made using the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCI, and Cochrane Library electronic databases. Initial screening of identified articles was based on abstracts read independently by two of the authors; full-text articles were again evaluated by two authors, who made the final decision on which articles should be included.
The search identified 3,882 articles; 624 were obtained for closer review. Of the reviewed full-text articles, seventy reported QALYs based on actual before-after measurements using a valid HRQoL instrument. The most frequently used instrument was EuroQol HRQoL instrument (EQ-5D, 47.5 percent). Other instruments used were Health Utilities Index (HUI, 8.8 percent), the Rosser-Kind Index (6.3 percent), Quality of Well-Being (QWB, 6.3 percent), Short Form-6D (SF-6D, 5.0 percent), and 15D (2.5 percent). The rest (23.8 percent) used a direct valuation method: Time Trade-Off (10.0 percent), Standard Gamble (5.0 percent), visual analogue scale (5.0 percent), or rating scale (3.8 percent). The most frequently studied medical specialties were orthopedics (15.5 percent), pulmonary diseases (12.7 percent), and cardiology (9.9 percent). Ninety percent of the studies came from four countries: United Kingdom, United States, Canada, the Netherlands. Approximately half of the papers were methodologically high quality randomized trials. Forty-nine percent of the studied interventions were viewed by the authors of the original studies as being cost-effective; only 13 percent of interventions were deemed not to be cost-effective.
Although QALYs gained are considered an important measure of effectiveness of health care, the number of studies in which QALYs are based on actual measurements of patients' HRQoL is still fairly limited.
本研究的目的是通过系统的文献综述,找出已发表的基于患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)实际测量结果使用质量调整生命年(QALYs)的研究,并确定哪些HRQoL工具被用于计算QALYs。此外,本研究的目的还包括根据医学专科、所研究的干预措施、获得的结果、质量、原产国、观察到的QALY增益以及关于成本效益的结果解释来描述这些研究。
使用MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、SCI和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库对文献进行系统检索。对所识别文章的初步筛选基于两位作者独立阅读的摘要;全文文章再次由两位作者进行评估,他们最终决定应纳入哪些文章。
检索到3882篇文章;获取了624篇进行进一步审查。在审查的全文文章中,70篇报告了基于使用有效HRQoL工具进行的实际前后测量得出的QALYs。使用最频繁的工具是欧洲生活质量健康量表(EQ-5D,占47.5%)。使用的其他工具包括健康效用指数(HUI,占8.8%)、罗瑟-金指数(占6.3%)、健康状况指数(QWB,占6.3%)、简式健康调查问卷6维度(SF-6D,占5.0%)和15维度健康量表(15D,占2.5%)。其余(23.8%)使用直接估值方法:时间权衡法(占10.0%)、标准博弈法(占