Ducic Ivica, Felder John M, Quadri Humair S
Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jun;68(6):606-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3e68.
Considering that several different specialties perform nerve decompressions in the upper extremity, universal technical standards do not exist. Many of these procedures are performed via incisions that are made unnecessarily long to achieve adequate exposure of the nerves and their known anatomical compression points. The purpose of this article is to introduce reproducible techniques that reliably allow the necessary anatomical exposure while minimizing the length of required skin incisions.
The senior author's surgical approach to the most common nerve compression syndromes of the upper extremity is presented in detail. Typical incision lengths and surgical exposure are demonstrated photographically. The safety of using this technique is examined by review of the medical records of all patients undergoing this procedure from 2003 to 2011, looking for technical complications such as unintentional damage to nerves or adjacent structures.
Three hundred twenty consecutive cases were identified in which the described techniques were used to release known anatomical compression points of the upper extremity nerves, including 161 decompressions of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, 37 decompressions of the anterior interosseous nerve and 45 of the posterior interosseous nerve in the proximal forearm, and 77 decompressions of the radial sensory nerve in the distal forearm. Typical incision lengths we used for these procedures were 5 cm for the ulnar nerve, 4.5 cm for the anterior interosseous nerve, 4 cm for the posterior interosseous nerve, and 3 cm for the radial sensory nerve. Review of medical records revealed no incidences of unintentional injury to nerves or adjacent important structures. Functional and neurological recovery outcomes were not assessed, as those would be the subject of subsequent studies.
Known anatomical compression points can be reliably accessed and decompressed for the treatment of all common upper extremity nerve compression syndromes using minimized skin incisions and the techniques presented in this article. With appropriate knowledge of anatomy, this can be performed without expensive equipment or any additional risk of injury to the patient, making classically described longer incisions unnecessarily morbid.
鉴于上肢神经减压手术由多个不同专业进行,目前尚无通用的技术标准。这些手术中的许多都是通过不必要的长切口来充分暴露神经及其已知的解剖压迫点。本文旨在介绍可重复的技术,这些技术能够可靠地实现必要的解剖暴露,同时将所需皮肤切口的长度减至最短。
详细介绍资深作者针对上肢最常见神经压迫综合征的手术方法。通过照片展示典型的切口长度和手术暴露情况。通过回顾2003年至2011年接受该手术的所有患者的病历,检查使用该技术的安全性,查找如意外损伤神经或相邻结构等技术并发症。
共识别出320例连续病例,其中所描述的技术用于松解上肢神经的已知解剖压迫点,包括肘部尺神经减压161例、前臂近端骨间前神经减压37例和骨间后神经减压45例,以及前臂远端桡神经感觉支减压77例。我们用于这些手术的典型切口长度分别为:尺神经5厘米、骨间前神经4.5厘米、骨间后神经4厘米、桡神经感觉支3厘米。病历回顾显示未发生意外损伤神经或相邻重要结构的情况。由于功能和神经恢复结果将是后续研究的主题,因此未进行评估。
使用最小化皮肤切口和本文介绍的技术,可以可靠地进入并减压已知的解剖压迫点,以治疗所有常见的上肢神经压迫综合征。凭借适当的解剖学知识,无需昂贵设备即可进行该操作,且不会给患者带来额外的损伤风险,从而使传统描述的更长切口变得不必要地有害。