• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术型医疗中心术后呼吸系统并发症编码实践的差异:对 AHRQ 术后呼吸衰竭患者安全指标的影响。

Variation in academic medical centers' coding practices for postoperative respiratory complications: implications for the AHRQ postoperative respiratory failure Patient Safety Indicator.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9):792-800. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8b69.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8b69
PMID:22643197
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 11 uses International Classification of Disease, 9th Clinical Modification diagnosis code 518.81 ("Acute respiratory failure")-but not the closely related alternative, 518.5 ("Pulmonary insufficiency after trauma and surgery")-to detect cases of postoperative respiratory failure. We sought to determine whether hospitals vary in the use of 518.81 versus 518.5 and whether such variation correlates with coder beliefs.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of administrative data from July 2009 through June 2010 for UHC (formerly University HealthSystem Consortium)-affiliated centers to assess the use of diagnosis codes 518.81 and 518.5 in PSI 11-eligible cases. We also surveyed coders at these centers to evaluate whether variation in the use of 518.81 versus 518.5 might be linked to coder beliefs. We asked survey respondents which diagnosis they would use for 2 ambiguous cases of postoperative pulmonary complications and how much they agreed with 6 statements about the coding process.

RESULTS

UHC-affiliated centers demonstrated wide variation in the use of 518.81 and 518.5, ranging from 0 to 26 cases and 0 to 56 cases/1000 PSI 11-eligible hospitalizations, respectively. Of 56 survey respondents, 64% chose 518.81 and 30% chose 518.5 for a clinical scenario involving postoperative respiratory failure, but these responses were not associated with actual coding of 518.81 or 518.5 at the center level. Sixty-two percent of respondents agreed that they are constrained by the words that physicians use. Their self-reported likelihood of querying physicians to clarify the diagnosis was significantly associated with coding of 518.5 at the center level.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent to which diagnosis code 518.81 is used relative to 518.5 varies considerably across centers, based on local coding practice, the specific wording of physician documentation, and coder-physician communication. To standardize the coding of postoperative respiratory failure, the 518.81 and 518.5 codes have recently been revised to make the available options clearer and mutually exclusive, which may improve the capacity of PSI 11 to discriminate true differences in quality of care.

摘要

背景

医疗保健研究和质量机构患者安全指标 (PSI) 11 使用国际疾病分类,第 9 临床修订版诊断代码 518.81(“急性呼吸衰竭”)-但不使用密切相关的替代方法 518.5(“创伤和手术后肺功能不全”)-来检测术后呼吸衰竭病例。我们试图确定医院在使用 518.81 与 518.5 方面是否存在差异,以及这种差异是否与编码员的信念相关。

研究设计

我们对 2009 年 7 月至 2010 年 6 月期间 UHC(前身为大学卫生系统联盟)附属中心的行政数据进行了横断面分析,以评估 PSI 11 合格病例中诊断代码 518.81 和 518.5 的使用情况。我们还调查了这些中心的编码员,以评估使用 518.81 与 518.5 的差异是否与编码员的信念有关。我们要求调查受访者在 2 个术后肺部并发症的模糊病例中使用哪种诊断,并对 6 个关于编码过程的陈述表示多大程度的同意。

结果

UHC 附属中心在使用 518.81 和 518.5 方面存在很大差异,范围分别为 0 至 26 例和 0 至 56 例/1000 例 PSI 11 合格住院治疗。在 56 名调查受访者中,64%的人选择 518.81,30%的人选择 518.5 用于涉及术后呼吸衰竭的临床情况,但这些反应与中心层面的实际 518.81 或 518.5 编码无关。62%的受访者同意他们受到医生使用的词语的限制。他们自我报告的询问医生以澄清诊断的可能性与中心层面的 518.5 编码显著相关。

结论

基于当地编码实践、医生记录的具体措辞以及编码员与医生之间的沟通,各个中心使用诊断代码 518.81 相对于 518.5 的程度差异很大。为了使术后呼吸衰竭的编码标准化,最近对 518.81 和 518.5 代码进行了修订,以使可用选项更加清晰且相互排斥,这可能会提高 PSI 11 区分护理质量真实差异的能力。

相似文献

1
Variation in academic medical centers' coding practices for postoperative respiratory complications: implications for the AHRQ postoperative respiratory failure Patient Safety Indicator.学术型医疗中心术后呼吸系统并发症编码实践的差异:对 AHRQ 术后呼吸衰竭患者安全指标的影响。
Med Care. 2012 Sep;50(9):792-800. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8b69.
2
Detection of postoperative respiratory failure: how predictive is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Indicator?术后呼吸衰竭的检测:医疗保健研究与质量局的患者安全指标的预测能力如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Sep;211(3):347-354.e1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.022. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
3
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative respiratory failure"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后呼吸衰竭”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):935-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.034. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
4
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicator for Postoperative Respiratory Failure (PSI 11) does not identify accurately patients who received unsafe care.医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的术后呼吸衰竭患者安全指标(PSI 11)无法准确识别接受了不安全护理的患者。
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):858-868. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
5
[ICD-10 adaptation of 15 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators].[医疗保健研究与质量局15项患者安全指标的国际疾病分类第十版改编版]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Oct;59(5):341-50. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
6
How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.如何最好地衡量手术质量?在单一机构中比较医疗保健研究和质量局患者安全指标 (AHRQ-PSI) 和美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划 (ACS-NSQIP) 的术后不良事件。
Surgery. 2011 Nov;150(5):943-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
7
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标对儿童医院的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):135-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1083. Epub 2004 Dec 3.
8
Validity of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators at an academic medical center.学术医疗中心中医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标的有效性。
Am Surg. 2013 Jun;79(6):578-82.
9
Improving identification of postoperative respiratory failure missed by the patient safety indicator algorithm.提高对患者安全指标算法遗漏的术后呼吸衰竭的识别能力。
Am J Med Qual. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):315-23. doi: 10.1177/1062860612468482. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
10
Validity of the AHRQ patient safety indicator for postoperative physiologic and metabolic derangement based on a national sample of medical records.基于全国范围内的病历样本,评估 AHRQ 术后生理和代谢紊乱患者安全指标的有效性。
Med Care. 2013 Sep;51(9):806-11. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829c8b91.

引用本文的文献

1
Inconsistent Surgical Implant Documentation: A Case Study in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.手术植入物记录不一致:全膝关节和髋关节置换术的案例研究
Health Serv Insights. 2023 Mar 29;16:11786329231163008. doi: 10.1177/11786329231163008. eCollection 2023.
2
A comparison of two structured taxonomic strategies in capturing adverse events in U.S. hospitals.两种结构化分类策略在美国医院中捕获不良事件的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):613-622. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13090. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
3
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.
2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
4
The TRANSFORM Patient Safety Project: a microsystem approach to improving outcomes on inpatient units.“转变”患者安全项目:一种改善住院科室治疗效果的微系统方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30(4):425-33. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3067-7. Epub 2014 Oct 28.