Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Pacific Health Foundation, San Jose, California.
Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):619-628.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.037. Epub 2012 May 27.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are potent antiviral agents that might have additive or synergistic antiviral activity in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We compared the efficacy and safety of ETV monotherapy with those of a combination of ETV and TDF. METHODS: We performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter, superiority study of 379 nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (n = 264) or HBeAg-negative (n = 115) CHB. Subjects were given ETV 0.5 mg (n = 182) or a combination of ETV 0.5 mg and TDF 300 mg (n = 197) for 100 weeks. RESULTS: At week 96, comparable proportions of patients in each study arm achieved the primary end point of a level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <50 IU/mL (83.2% vs 76.4%; P = .088). Among HBeAg-positive patients, a greater proportion given combination therapy achieved levels of HBV DNA <50 IU/mL than those given ETV alone (80.4% vs 69.8%; P = .046). However, this difference was observed only in patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL (79% vs 62%) and not in those with baseline levels of HBV DNA <10(8) IU/mL (83% in both arms). Rates of HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion were comparable between groups, whereas the rate of alanine aminotransferase normalization was greater in the ETV monotherapy group. No HBV variants associated with ETV or TDF resistance were detected. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports of ETV or TDF monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The antiviral efficacy of ETV monotherapy is comparable to that of ETV plus TDF in a mixed population of nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with CHB (70% HBeAg positive). The combination therapy could provide an incremental benefit to HBeAg-positive patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL.
背景与目的:恩替卡韦(ETV)和富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)是两种强效抗病毒药物,在治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者时可能具有相加或协同的抗病毒活性。我们比较了 ETV 单药治疗与 ETV 和 TDF 联合治疗的疗效和安全性。
方法:我们对 379 例乙型肝炎 e 抗原(HBeAg)阳性(n = 264)或 HBeAg 阴性(n = 115)CHB 的核苷(酸)初治患者进行了一项随机、开放标签、多中心、优效性研究。受试者接受 ETV 0.5 mg(n = 182)或 ETV 0.5 mg 和 TDF 300 mg 联合治疗(n = 197),疗程 100 周。
结果:在第 96 周时,每个研究组达到主要终点(HBV DNA 水平 <50 IU/mL)的患者比例相当(83.2%比 76.4%;P =.088)。在 HBeAg 阳性患者中,联合治疗组达到 HBV DNA <50 IU/mL 的比例大于单独使用 ETV 组(80.4%比 69.8%;P =.046)。然而,这种差异仅见于基线 HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL 的患者(79%比 62%),而基线 HBV DNA <10(8) IU/mL 的患者中无差异(两组均为 83%)。两组 HBeAg 丢失和 HBeAg 血清学转换率相当,而 ETV 单药治疗组的丙氨酸氨基转移酶正常化率更高。未检测到与 ETV 或 TDF 耐药相关的 HBV 变异体。安全性特征与 ETV 或 TDF 单药治疗的先前报告一致。
结论:ETV 单药治疗在核苷(酸)初治 CHB 混合人群(70%HBeAg 阳性)中的抗病毒疗效与 ETV 加 TDF 相当。联合治疗可能为基线 HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL 的 HBeAg 阳性患者带来额外获益。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015-3-7
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2017-10-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-22
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024
Hepatol Commun. 2022-5
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021-11-10