Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2280-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2405-5. Epub 2012 May 30.
Percutaneous biopsy for musculoskeletal tumors commonly relies on imaging adjuncts including ultrasound (US), CT, or MRI. These modalities however have disadvantages (US) or are cumbersome, not universally available, and costly (CT and MRI). US fusion is a novel technique that fuses previously obtained CT or MRI data with real-time US, which allows biopsies to be performed in an US suite. It has proven useful in various body systems but musculoskeletal applications remain scarce. Our goal is to evaluate the fusion technology and determine its ability to diagnose musculoskeletal tumors.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether biopsies performed via US fusion compared with CT guidance provide equivalent diagnostic yield and accuracy and allow quicker biopsy scheduling and procedure times.
Forty-seven patients were assigned to undergo either US fusion (with MR, n = 16 or CT, n = 15) or CT-guided biopsies (n = 16). We evaluated adequacy of the histologic specimen (diagnostic yield) and correlation with surgical pathology (diagnostic accuracy). We determined scheduling times and lengths of the biopsy.
US fusion and CT-guided biopsy groups had comparable diagnostic yields (CT = 94%; US/MRI = 94%; US/CT = 93%) and accuracy (CT = 83%; US/MRI = 90%; US/CT = 100%). US fusion biopsies were faster to schedule and perform. All procedures were safe with minimal complications.
US fusion provides a high diagnostic yield and accuracy comparable to CT-guided biopsy while performed in the convenience of an US suite. This may have resulted in the observed faster scheduling and biopsy times.
Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
肌肉骨骼肿瘤的经皮活检通常依赖于影像学辅助手段,包括超声(US)、CT 或 MRI。然而,这些方法存在缺点(US)或繁琐、不普及且昂贵(CT 和 MRI)。US 融合是一种将先前获得的 CT 或 MRI 数据与实时 US 融合的新技术,允许在 US 套件中进行活检。它已在各种身体系统中得到证明是有用的,但肌肉骨骼应用仍然很少。我们的目标是评估融合技术并确定其诊断肌肉骨骼肿瘤的能力。
问题/目的:我们确定通过 US 融合进行的活检与 CT 引导相比是否提供等效的诊断产量和准确性,并允许更快的活检预约和程序时间。
47 名患者被分配接受 US 融合(MR,n = 16 或 CT,n = 15)或 CT 引导活检(n = 16)。我们评估了组织学标本的充分性(诊断产量)以及与手术病理学的相关性(诊断准确性)。我们确定了预约时间和活检长度。
US 融合和 CT 引导活检组的诊断产量(CT = 94%;US/MRI = 94%;US/CT = 93%)和准确性(CT = 83%;US/MRI = 90%;US/CT = 100%)相当。US 融合活检的预约和执行速度更快。所有程序均安全,并发症最小。
US 融合在 US 套件的便利性下提供了与 CT 引导活检相当的高诊断产量和准确性。这可能导致观察到更快的预约和活检时间。
II 级,诊断研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。