• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模治疗食管腺癌和高级别异型增生的策略的成本效益。

Modeling the cost-effectiveness of strategies for treating esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Aug;16(8):1451-61. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1911-9. Epub 2012 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-012-1911-9
PMID:22644445
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to synthesize cost and health outcomes for current treatment pathways for esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and to model comparative net clinical and economic benefits of alternative management scenarios.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model of real-world practices for esophageal adenocarcinoma treatment by tumor stage was constructed and validated. The model synthesized treatment probabilities, survival, quality of life, and resource use extracted from epidemiological datasets, published literature, and expert opinion. Comparative analyses between current practice and five hypothetical scenarios for modified treatment were undertaken.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, outcomes across T stage ranged from 4.06 quality-adjusted life-years and costs of $3,179 for HGD to 1.62 quality-adjusted life-years and costs of $50,226 for stage T4. Greater use of endoscopic mucosal resection for stage T1 and measures to reduce esophagectomy mortality to 0-3 % produced modest gains, whereas a 20 % reduction in the proportion of patients presenting at stage T3 produced large incremental net benefits of $4,971 (95 % interval, $1,560-8,368).

CONCLUSION

These findings support measures that promote earlier diagnosis, such as developing risk assessment processes or endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. Incremental net monetary benefits for other strategies are relatively small in comparison to predicted gains from early detection strategies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在综合食管腺癌和高级别异型增生(HGD)当前治疗途径的成本和健康结果,并对替代管理方案的净临床和经济效益进行建模比较。

方法

构建并验证了一个基于肿瘤分期的食管腺癌治疗实际情况的决策分析模型。该模型综合了从流行病学数据集、已发表文献和专家意见中提取的治疗概率、生存、生活质量和资源利用情况。对当前实践与五种修改后的治疗方案的假设场景进行了比较分析。

结果

在 5 年内,各 T 分期的结果范围从 HGD 的 4.06 个质量调整生命年和 3179 美元的成本到 T4 期的 1.62 个质量调整生命年和 50226 美元的成本。T1 期更多地采用内镜黏膜切除术和降低食管切除术死亡率至 0-3%的措施会带来适度的收益,而 T3 期就诊患者比例降低 20%则会带来 4971 美元的增量净效益(95%置信区间,1560-8368 美元)。

结论

这些发现支持采取措施促进早期诊断,例如开发风险评估流程或巴雷特食管的内镜监测。与早期检测策略的预测收益相比,其他策略的增量净货币收益相对较小。

相似文献

1
Modeling the cost-effectiveness of strategies for treating esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia.建模治疗食管腺癌和高级别异型增生的策略的成本效益。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Aug;16(8):1451-61. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1911-9. Epub 2012 May 30.
2
Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis.内镜治疗与手术治疗 Barrett 食管早期癌的决策分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):623-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.047. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
3
What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.巴雷特食管高级别异型增生的最佳管理策略是什么?一项成本效益分析。
Gut. 2004 Dec;53(12):1736-44. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.033837.
4
Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus.内镜和非内镜细胞刷筛查 Barrett 食管的健康获益和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):62-73.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.060. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
5
Surveillance in patients with long-segment Barrett's oesophagus: a cost-effectiveness analysis.长段 Barrett 食管患者的监测:成本效益分析。
Gut. 2015 Jun;64(6):864-71. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307197. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
6
Barrett's esophagus: a new look at surveillance based on emerging estimates of cancer risk.巴雷特食管:基于新出现的癌症风险估计对监测的新认识。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Aug;94(8):2043-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01276.x.
7
An economic analysis of endoscopic ablative therapy for management of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.内镜消融治疗非发育异常性巴雷特食管的经济学分析。
Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):400-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214612. Epub 2009 May 5.
8
Treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.巴雷特食管伴高级别异型增生的治疗。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Mar;9(3):303-16. doi: 10.1586/14737140.9.3.303.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening, Surveillance, and Endoscopic Eradication Therapies for Managing the Burden of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.筛查、监测和内镜下根除治疗对食管腺癌负担的成本效益分析。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2021 Jan;31(1):77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
The Optimal Age to Stop Endoscopic Surveillance of Patients With Barrett's Esophagus Based on Sex and Comorbidity: A Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.基于性别和合并症的最佳内镜监测停止年龄:巴雷特食管的比较成本效益分析。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Aug;161(2):487-494.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-effectiveness modeling study of treatment interventions for stage I to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.一项关于I至III期食管鳞状细胞癌治疗干预措施的成本效益建模研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00352-5.
2
The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.健康研究中计算建模研究中使用专家 elicitation:系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):684-703. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211053794. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
[Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare resource use and medical costs for the management of oesophageal cancer.食管癌管理的医疗资源利用和医疗费用。
Br J Surg. 2011 Nov;98(11):1589-98. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7599.
2
Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.低容量医院的食管癌切除术结果:系统特征与死亡率的关系。
Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):912-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318213862f.
3
Is endoscopic surveillance for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus cost-effective? Review of economic evaluations.
[肿瘤性食管手术的经济层面:集中化至关重要]
Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(1):62-69. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0326-7.
4
Face Barrett's: esophageal adenocarcinoma affects the young.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):882-3. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2436-6. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
内镜监测非异型增生性 Barrett 食管是否具有成本效益?经济评价综述。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Feb;26(2):247-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06506.x.
4
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluating early response during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描在可治愈食管癌新辅助放化疗中评估早期反应的作用。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jan;253(1):56-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f66596.
5
Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer.食管癌术后肺部并发症的相关因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1460-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1474-5. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
6
Consistently estimating absolute risk difference when translating evidence to jurisdictions of interest.在将证据转化为有兴趣的司法管辖区时,始终估计绝对风险差异。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Feb;29(2):87-96. doi: 10.2165/11585910-000000000-00000.
7
Symptoms, investigations and management of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in Australia.澳大利亚食管和胃食管交界处癌症患者的症状、检查和治疗。
Med J Aust. 2010 Nov 15;193(10):572-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb04064.x.
8
A UK-based cost-utility analysis of radiofrequency ablation or oesophagectomy for the management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.英国一项关于射频消融或食管切除术治疗 Barrett 食管高级别异型增生的成本效用分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;32(11-12):1332-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04450.x. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
9
Endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness compared to esophagectomy.内镜治疗 Barrett 食管:与食管切除术相比的安全性和有效性的系统评价。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 27;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-111.
10
The value of value of information: best informing research design and prioritization using current methods.信息价值的价值:使用现有方法最佳告知研究设计和优先级排序。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(9):699-709. doi: 10.2165/11537370-000000000-00000.