• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘健康教育对参加学前教育中心的儿童的父母的影响。

The impact of asthma health education for parents of children attending head start centers.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, McAllen, TX 78503, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2012 Dec;37(6):1296-300. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9571-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-012-9571-y
PMID:22648657
Abstract

Parents of children who attend Head Start Centers are key participants in the health promotion and care of their own children. This non-randomized, longitudinal study aimed to test the effectiveness of an educational intervention based on the asthma and healthy homes curriculum targeting parents of Head Start children with or without an asthma diagnosis. One hundred and fifteen parents of children in Head Start Centers received an educational intervention at their corresponding sites, additionally pre- and post-test surveys were administered to measure educational intervention outcomes. A follow-up survey was conducted 6 months after the educational intervention was offered. Results showed a statistically significant increase in asthma and healthy home-knowledge (p < 0.001) in several areas. At 6 months post-intervention (54.4 %) (61 participants) were contacted and 98.4 % of made changes in their households as a result of their training. This study suggests that education can improve knowledge and change behaviors for the well-being of the residents of that household.

摘要

参加学前教育中心的儿童的家长是促进自身儿童健康和进行保健的关键参与者。这项非随机、纵向研究旨在测试一项以哮喘和健康家庭课程为基础的教育干预措施的有效性,该措施针对有或没有哮喘诊断的学前教育儿童的家长。115 名学前教育中心儿童的家长在其相应的地点接受了教育干预,此外还进行了预测试和后测试调查,以衡量教育干预的效果。在提供教育干预 6 个月后进行了后续调查。结果表明,在几个领域中,哮喘和健康家庭知识有了显著的提高(p < 0.001)。在干预后 6 个月(54.4%)(61 名参与者)取得联系,其中 98.4%的人因其培训而改变了家庭状况。这项研究表明,教育可以提高知识,改变行为,以造福家庭居民的健康。

相似文献

1
The impact of asthma health education for parents of children attending head start centers.哮喘健康教育对参加学前教育中心的儿童的父母的影响。
J Community Health. 2012 Dec;37(6):1296-300. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9571-y.
2
Impacting Environmental and Public Health through the Use of Dual Targeted and Tailored Asthma Educational Interventions.通过使用双重靶向和量身定制的哮喘教育干预措施来影响环境与公众健康。
J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:476173. doi: 10.1155/2015/476173. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
3
Asthma education in rural communities.农村社区的哮喘教育
Clin Excell Nurse Pract. 2001 May;5(3):168-74. doi: 10.1054/xc.2001.23124.
4
Incorporating what promotoras learn: becoming role models to effect positive change.将 promotoras 所学的知识融入其中:成为榜样,以产生积极的变化。
J Community Health. 2012 Oct;37(5):1026-31. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9526-8.
5
Opportunities for health promotion education in child care.儿童保育中的健康促进教育机会。
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e499-505. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0467.
6
Parental knowledge and attitudes regarding asthma in their children: Impact of an educational intervention in an Indian population.家长对子女哮喘的认知和态度:印度人群中教育干预的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Mar;55(3):607-615. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24647. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Effectiveness evaluation of Contra Caries Oral Health Education Program for improving Spanish-speaking parents' preventive oral health knowledge and behaviors for their young children.预防龋齿口腔健康教育项目对提高讲西班牙语的家长关于其幼儿预防性口腔健康知识和行为的有效性评估。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;44(6):564-576. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12250. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
Development of a health education program for parents of preschool children with asthma.为哮喘学龄前儿童家长制定健康教育计划。
Health Educ Res. 1993 Mar;8(1):53-68. doi: 10.1093/her/8.1.53.
9
Evaluation of a Home-Based Environmental and Educational Intervention to Improve Health in Vulnerable Households: Southeastern Pennsylvania Lead and Healthy Homes Program.评估一项基于家庭的环境与教育干预措施以改善弱势家庭健康状况:宾夕法尼亚州东南部铅与健康家庭项目
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 9;13(9):900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090900.
10
Evaluation of a sleep education program for low-income preschool children and their families.评估一个针对低收入学龄前儿童及其家庭的睡眠教育计划。
Sleep. 2014 Jun 1;37(6):1117-25. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3774.

引用本文的文献

1
Preschool children's asthma medication: parental knowledge, attitudes, practices, and adherence.学龄前儿童的哮喘药物治疗:家长的知识、态度、行为及依从性
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 3;15:1292308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1292308. eCollection 2024.
2
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Intranasal Corticosteroid in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: Development of a New Questionnaire.变应性鼻炎患者鼻用糖皮质激素的知识、态度和实践:一种新问卷的编制
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;10(1):8. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010008.
3
Evaluation of Healthy South Texas Asthma Program on improving health outcomes and reducing health disparities among the underserved Hispanic population: using the RE-AIM model.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in risk communication: a pilot study of asthmatic children, their parents, and home environments.差异的风险沟通:一项哮喘患儿、其父母和家庭环境的初步研究。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 May;103(5):388-91. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30334-5.
2
Healthy Homes University: a home-based environmental intervention and education program for families with pediatric asthma in Michigan.健康家园大学:密歇根州针对小儿哮喘家庭的基于家庭的环境干预和教育计划。
Public Health Rep. 2011 May-Jun;126 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):14-26. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S104.
3
A community-based strategy for improving asthma management and outcomes for preschoolers.
评估健康南得克萨斯哮喘计划对改善服务不足的西班牙裔人群的健康结果和减少健康差距的影响:使用 RE-AIM 模型。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Nov 16;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02991-8.
4
A Patient-Centered Asthma Management Communication Intervention for Rural Latino Children: Protocol for a Waiting-List Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对农村拉丁裔儿童的以患者为中心的哮喘管理沟通干预措施:等待名单随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 1;9(12):e18977. doi: 10.2196/18977.
5
Knowledge and awareness of nasal allergy among patients in a developing country.一个发展中国家患者对鼻过敏的认知与了解
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1477-1482. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_914_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Effects of the home-based educational intervention on health outcomes among primarily Hispanic children with asthma: a quasi-experimental study.基于家庭的教育干预对主要为西班牙裔哮喘儿童健康结果的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7272-5.
7
Knowledge and practice of parents and guardians about childhood asthma at King Abdulaziz Medical City for National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王国民警卫队医疗城家长及监护人对儿童哮喘的认知与实践
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Apr 13;11:67-75. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S143829. eCollection 2018.
8
Impacting Environmental and Public Health through the Use of Dual Targeted and Tailored Asthma Educational Interventions.通过使用双重靶向和量身定制的哮喘教育干预措施来影响环境与公众健康。
J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:476173. doi: 10.1155/2015/476173. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
9
A Pilot Study of Changes in Environmental Knowledge and Behaviors among Head Start Employees and Parents Following Environmental Health Training in Webb County, TX.德克萨斯州韦伯县开端计划员工和家长接受环境卫生培训后环境知识与行为变化的试点研究
J Immigr Minor Health. 2016 Feb;18(1):135-42. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0150-4.
10
Evaluation of a sleep education program for low-income preschool children and their families.评估一个针对低收入学龄前儿童及其家庭的睡眠教育计划。
Sleep. 2014 Jun 1;37(6):1117-25. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3774.
以社区为基础的策略,改善学龄前儿童的哮喘管理和结果。
J Urban Health. 2011 Feb;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9479-8.
4
JAMA patient page. Chronic diseases of children.《美国医学会杂志》患者专页。儿童慢性病
JAMA. 2010 Feb 17;303(7):682. doi: 10.1001/jama.303.7.682.
5
An examination of interventions to reduce respiratory health and injury hazards in homes of low-income families.一项关于减少低收入家庭住宅中呼吸健康和伤害风险的干预措施的研究。
Environ Res. 2009 Jan;109(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
6
Characteristics of children with asthma who are enrolled in a Head Start program.参加“启智计划”项目的哮喘儿童的特征。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Sep;114(3):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.025.
7
Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma.城市哮喘儿童居家环境干预的结果
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1068-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032097.
8
Healthy housing: a structured review of published evaluations of US interventions to improve health by modifying housing in the United States, 1990-2001.健康住房:对1990 - 2001年美国通过改善住房来促进健康的干预措施已发表评估的结构化综述。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1471-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1471.
9
A randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention program in the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants.一项关于多方面干预计划在高危婴儿哮喘一级预防中有效性的随机对照研究。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jul;154(7):657-63. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.7.657.
10
Association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and exacerbations of asthma in children.儿童暴露于环境烟草烟雾与哮喘发作之间的关联。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 10;328(23):1665-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306103282303.