Suppr超能文献

评估在线子宫肌瘤栓塞治疗资源的可靠性和质量。

Assessing the reliability and quality of online uterine fibroid embolization resources.

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Michael G. Degroote School of Medicine, 1200 Main St West, MDCL 3111, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Apr;36(2):385-94. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0418-9. Epub 2012 May 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to examine the best internet resources about uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) pertinent to medical trainees, radiologists, gynecologists, family physicians, and patients.

METHODS

The terms "uterine fibroid embolization," "uterine fibroid embolization," and "uterine artery embolization" were entered into Google, Yahoo, and Bing search engines; the top 20 hits were assessed. The hits were categorized as organizational or nonorganizational. Additionally, 23 radiological and obstetrical organizations were assessed. The DISCERN instrument and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks (authorship, attribution, currency, disclosure) were used to assess the information critically. The scope, strength, weaknesses, and unique features were highlighted for the top five organizational and nonorganizational websites.

RESULTS

A total of 203 websites were reviewed; 23 were removed in accordance with the exclusion criteria and 146 were duplicate websites, for a total of 34 unique sites. It was found that 35 % (12/34 websites) were organizational (family medicine, radiology, obstetrics/gynecology) and 65 % (22/34 websites) were nonorganizational (teaching or patient resources). The overall mean DISCERN score was 49.6 (10.7). Two-tailed, unpaired t test demonstrated no statistically significant difference between organizational and nonorganizational websites (p = 0.101). JAMA benchmarks revealed 44 % (15/34 websites) with authorship, 71 % (24/34 websites) with attribution, 68 % (23/34 websites) with disclosure, and 47 % (16/34 websites) with currency.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall quality of websites for UFE is moderate, with important but not serious shortcomings. The best websites provided relevant information about the procedure, benefits/risks, and were interactive. DISCERN scores were compromised by sites failing to provide resources for shared decision-making, additional support, and discussing consequence of no treatment. JAMA benchmarks revealed lack of authorship and currency.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察与医学受训者、放射科医师、妇科医师、家庭医生和患者相关的子宫肌瘤栓塞(UFE)的最佳互联网资源。

方法

将“子宫肌瘤栓塞”、“子宫肌瘤栓塞”和“子宫动脉栓塞”这三个术语输入 Google、Yahoo 和 Bing 搜索引擎;评估前 20 个搜索结果。将搜索结果分为组织性和非组织性。此外,还评估了 23 个放射学和妇产科组织。使用 DISCERN 工具和《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准(作者、归因、时效性、披露)对信息进行批判性评估。突出了前 5 个组织性和非组织性网站的范围、强度、弱点和独特功能。

结果

共审查了 203 个网站;根据排除标准删除了 23 个,146 个是重复网站,共有 34 个独特网站。发现 35%(12/34 个网站)是组织性(家庭医学、放射学、妇产科),65%(22/34 个网站)是非组织性(教学或患者资源)。总体平均 DISCERN 得分为 49.6(10.7)。双尾、非配对 t 检验表明,组织性和非组织性网站之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p=0.101)。JAMA 基准显示,44%(15/34 个网站)有作者,71%(24/34 个网站)有归因,68%(23/34 个网站)有披露,47%(16/34 个网站)有时效性。

结论

UFE 网站的整体质量中等,存在重要但不严重的缺陷。最好的网站提供了关于该程序的相关信息,包括好处/风险,并且具有交互性。DISCERN 评分因未能提供共同决策、额外支持以及讨论不治疗的后果的资源而受到影响。JAMA 基准显示缺乏作者和时效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验