University of Arkansas, Department of Animal Science, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jun;90(6):1972-85. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4077.
Exposure to animals persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) results in immunomodulation of cohorts that may have health and growth consequences; however, effects may differ in low-risk, preconditioned (PC) vs. high-risk, auction market (AM) beef cattle. Our objective was to compare health and performance of PC or AM management systems with (PI) or without (CON) presence of a PI-BVDV pen mate using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Four shipment blocks of crossbred PC steers (n = 236) from 3 ranch-origins were weaned, dewormed, vaccinated, tested for PI-BVDV, and kept on the ranch for ≥42 d. Subsequently, PC steers were transported to a stocker receiving unit (RU), weighed (251 ± 2 kg), blood sampled, stratified by d -1 BW, and assigned randomly to treatment (PCPI or PCCON) with no additional processing. Simultaneously, 4 blocks of crossbred AM calves (n = 292) were assembled from regional auction markets and transported to the RU ± 36 h from PC arrival. The AM calves were weighed (245 ± 1.3 kg), stratified by gender and d -1 BW, processed under the same regimen used for PC steers at their origin ranch except bull calves were castrated, and then assigned randomly to treatment (AMPI or AMCON). Treatment pens (0.45 ha) were arranged spatially such that PI did not have fence-line or water source contact with CON. Calves were fed identically and followed the same antibiotic treatment protocol. Daily BW gain for the entire 42-d receiving trial was greater (P < 0.001) for PC (1.2 kg) compared with AM (0.85 kg). There was an exposure effect (P = 0.002) on ADG from d 28 to 42; CON gained 1.12 kg vs. 0.90 kg BW for PI cohort. Morbidity was markedly greater (P < 0.001) in AM (70%) vs. PC (7%), resulting in (P < 0.001) an antibiotic treatment cost of $20.52 and $2.48/animal, respectively. Treatment with a third antibiotic occurred more often (P = 0.04) for PI cohort, and the percentage of chronically ill cattle was greatest (P = 0.06) for AMPI. Upon arrival, BVDV type 1a, 1b, and 2a titers were greater for PC (treatment × day, P < 0.001), and the percentage seropositive to BVDV type 1a on d 0 was 100% for PC vs. 23% in AM. Platelets increased transiently (P < 0.001) with greater platelets observed in AM (P < 0.001). Results indicate that PC calves gain faster and require fewer antibiotic treatments during the receiving period. Exposure to PI reduced BW gain from d 28 to 42, increased the number of calves treated thrice, and increased chronically ill cattle for AM.
接触持续感染(PI)牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)的动物会导致队列的免疫调节,这可能对健康和生长产生影响;然而,在低风险、预处理(PC)与高风险、拍卖市场(AM)肉牛中,影响可能不同。我们的目的是比较 PC 或 AM 管理系统与(PI)或无(CON)PI-BVDV 笔友存在的健康和性能,使用 2×2 析因安排。来自 3 个牧场起源的杂交 PC 阉牛(n = 236)在断奶、驱虫、接种疫苗、检测 PI-BVDV 后,在牧场中至少停留 42 d。随后,PC 阉牛被运送到饲养场接收单位(RU),称重(251 ± 2 kg),采血,按 d-1 BW 分层,并随机分配到治疗(PCPI 或 PCCON),无额外处理。同时,4 批杂交 AM 小牛(n = 292)从地区拍卖市场汇集,并在 PC 到达后运送到 RU ± 36 h。AM 小牛称重(245 ± 1.3 kg),按性别和 d-1 BW 分层,在原籍牧场使用与 PC 阉牛相同的处理方案进行处理,但公牛小牛被阉割,然后随机分配到治疗(AMPI 或 AMCON)。处理栏(0.45 公顷)在空间上排列,使 PI 与 CON 没有围栏线或水源接触。小牛以相同的方式喂养,并遵循相同的抗生素治疗方案。整个 42 天接收试验的日增重(ADG)均显著高于 PC(1.2 kg)(P < 0.001)与 AM(0.85 kg)。从第 28 天到第 42 天,ADG 存在暴露效应(P = 0.002);CON 队列的体重增加了 1.12 kg,而 PI 队列的体重增加了 0.90 kg。AM(70%)的发病率明显高于 PC(7%)(P < 0.001),导致(P < 0.001)抗生素治疗费用分别为 20.52 美元和 2.48 美元/头。PI 队列更常接受第三种抗生素治疗(P = 0.04),慢性患病牛的百分比最高(P = 0.06),为 AMPI。到达时,PC(处理×天,P < 0.001)的 BVDV 1a、1b 和 2a 滴度更高,PC 对 BVDV 1a 的血清阳性率在 d 0 时为 100%,而 AM 为 23%。血小板短暂增加(P < 0.001),AM 中观察到的血小板更多(P < 0.001)。结果表明,PC 小牛在接收期内增重更快,需要的抗生素治疗更少。接触 PI 减少了从第 28 天到第 42 天的体重增加,增加了三次治疗的小牛数量,并增加了 AM 的慢性患病牛。