University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge, UK.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2012 Feb 28;3:34. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00034. eCollection 2012.
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors utilize common phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt and Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathways to mediate a broad spectrum of "metabolic" and "mitogenic" responses. Specificity of insulin and IGF action in vivo must in part reflect expression of receptors and responsive pathways in different tissues but it is widely assumed that it is also determined by the ligand binding and signaling mechanisms of the receptors. This review focuses on receptor-proximal events in insulin/IGF signaling and examines their contribution to specificity of downstream responses. Insulin and IGF receptors may differ subtly in the efficiency with which they recruit their major substrates (IRS-1 and IRS-2 and Shc) and this could influence effectiveness of signaling to "metabolic" and "mitogenic" responses. Other substrates (Grb2-associated binder, downstream of kinases, SH2Bs, Crk), scaffolds (RACK1, β-arrestins, cytohesins), and pathways (non-receptor tyrosine kinases, phosphoinositide kinases, reactive oxygen species) have been less widely studied. Some of these components appear to be specifically involved in "metabolic" or "mitogenic" signaling but it has not been shown that this reflects receptor-preferential interaction. Very few receptor-specific interactions have been characterized, and their roles in signaling are unclear. Signaling specificity might also be imparted by differences in intracellular trafficking or feedback regulation of receptors, but few studies have directly addressed this possibility. Although published data are not wholly conclusive, no evidence has yet emerged for signaling mechanisms that are specifically engaged by insulin receptors but not IGF receptors or vice versa, and there is only limited evidence for differential activation of signaling mechanisms that are common to both receptors. Cellular context, rather than intrinsic receptor activity, therefore appears to be the major determinant of whether responses to insulin and IGFs are perceived as "metabolic" or "mitogenic."
胰岛素和胰岛素样生长因子 (IGF) 受体利用共同的磷酸肌醇 3-激酶/Akt 和 Ras/细胞外信号调节激酶信号通路来介导广泛的“代谢”和“有丝分裂”反应。胰岛素和 IGF 在体内的作用特异性部分反映了不同组织中受体和反应途径的表达,但人们普遍认为,它还取决于受体的配体结合和信号转导机制。本综述重点介绍胰岛素/IGF 信号转导中的受体近端事件,并研究其对下游反应特异性的贡献。胰岛素和 IGF 受体在招募其主要底物(IRS-1 和 IRS-2 和 Shc)的效率上可能略有不同,这可能会影响信号转导到“代谢”和“有丝分裂”反应的有效性。其他底物(Grb2 相关结合物、激酶下游、SH2Bs、Crk)、支架(RACK1、β-抑制素、细胞丝氨酸)和途径(非受体酪氨酸激酶、磷酸肌醇激酶、活性氧)的研究较少。其中一些成分似乎专门参与“代谢”或“有丝分裂”信号转导,但尚未表明这反映了受体优先相互作用。很少有受体特异性相互作用得到了表征,其在信号转导中的作用尚不清楚。信号转导特异性也可能由受体的细胞内运输或反馈调节的差异赋予,但很少有研究直接解决这种可能性。尽管已发表的数据并不完全具有结论性,但尚未出现仅由胰岛素受体而不是 IGF 受体或反之亦然特异性参与的信号转导机制的证据,并且只有有限的证据表明共同受体的信号转导机制的差异激活。因此,细胞环境而不是内在受体活性似乎是决定对胰岛素和 IGF 反应是被视为“代谢”还是“有丝分裂”的主要因素。