Suppr超能文献

患者及其全科医生对让护士专家参与尿失禁患者初级护理的满意度。

Consumer satisfaction among patients and their general practitioners about involving nurse specialists in primary care for patients with urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Albers-Heitner Pytha, Winkens Ron, Berghmans Bary, Joore Manuela, Nieman Fred, Severens Johan, Lagro-Janssen Toine

机构信息

Department of Integrated Healtcare, MUMC+ (Maastricht University Medical Centre), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):253-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01023.x. Epub 2012 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a very common problem, but existing guidelines on UI are not followed. To bring care in line with guidelines, we planned an intervention to involve nurse specialists on UI in primary care and assessed this in a randomised controlled trial. Alongside this intervention, we assessed consumer satisfaction among patients and general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

Patients' satisfaction with the care provided by either nurse specialists (intervention group) or GPs (control group), respectively, was measured with a self-completed questionnaire. GPs' views on the involvement of nurse specialists were measured in a structured telephone interview.

RESULTS

The patient satisfaction score on the care offered by nurse specialists was 8.4 (scale 1-10), vs. 6.7 for care-as-usual by GPs. Over 85% of patients would recommend nurse specialist care to their best friends and 77% of the GPs considered the role of the nurse specialist to be beneficial, giving it a mean score of 7.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the sample was relatively small and the stability of the results only provisionally established, substituting UI care from GP to nurse specialist appears to be welcomed by both patients and GPs. Small changes like giving additional UI-specific information and devoting more attention to UI (which had been given little attention before) would provide a simple instrument to stimulate patients to change their behaviour in the right direction.

摘要

背景

尿失禁(UI)是一个非常常见的问题,但现有的尿失禁指南并未得到遵循。为使护理符合指南,我们计划了一项干预措施,让初级护理中的尿失禁专科护士参与其中,并在一项随机对照试验中对此进行评估。与此同时,我们评估了患者和全科医生(GP)的消费者满意度。

方法

分别用一份自我填写的问卷来衡量患者对专科护士(干预组)或全科医生(对照组)提供的护理的满意度。通过结构化电话访谈来衡量全科医生对专科护士参与情况的看法。

结果

专科护士提供的护理的患者满意度得分为8.4(1 - 10分制),而全科医生常规护理的满意度得分为6.7。超过85%的患者会向他们最好的朋友推荐专科护士护理,77%的全科医生认为专科护士的角色是有益的,平均评分为7.2。

结论

尽管样本相对较小且结果的稳定性只是初步确定,但将尿失禁护理从全科医生转至专科护士似乎受到患者和全科医生双方的欢迎。像提供额外的尿失禁特定信息以及更多关注尿失禁(此前很少受到关注)这样的小改变,将提供一种简单的手段来促使患者朝着正确方向改变其行为。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验