Riverside Community Care, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts 01545-6242, USA.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2012;13(4):397-413. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2012.664967.
Dissociative symptoms, first-rank symptoms of schizophrenia, and delusions were assessed in 40 schizophrenia patients and 40 dissociative identity disorder (DID) patients with the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID). Schizophrenia patients were diagnosed with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders; DID patients were diagnosed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders-Revised. DID patients obtained significantly (a) higher dissociation scores; (b) higher passive-influence scores (first-rank symptoms); and (c) higher scores on scales that measure child voices, angry voices, persecutory voices, voices arguing, and voices commenting. Schizophrenia patients obtained significantly higher delusion scores than did DID patients. What is odd is that the dissociation scores of schizophrenia patients were unrelated to their reports of childhood maltreatment. Multiple regression analyses indicated that 81% of the variance in DID patients' dissociation scores was predicted by the MID's Ego-Alien Experiences Scale, whereas 92% of the variance in schizophrenia patients' dissociation scores was predicted by the MID's Voices Scale. We propose that schizophrenia patients' responses to the MID do not index the same pathology as do the responses of DID patients. We argue that neither phenomenological definitions of dissociation nor the current generation of dissociation instruments (which are uniformly phenomenological in nature) can distinguish between the dissociative phenomena of DID and what we suspect are just the dissociation-like phenomena of schizophrenia.
在 40 名精神分裂症患者和 40 名分离性身份障碍(DID)患者中,使用多维分离量表(MID)评估了分离症状、精神分裂症的一级症状和妄想。精神分裂症患者的诊断采用DSM-IV 轴 I 障碍的结构性临床访谈;DID 患者的诊断采用 DSM-IV 修订版分离障碍的结构性临床访谈。DID 患者获得了显著的:(a)更高的分离评分;(b)更高的被动影响评分(一级症状);以及(c)测量儿童声音、愤怒声音、迫害声音、争吵声音和评论声音的量表上的得分更高。精神分裂症患者的妄想评分明显高于 DID 患者。奇怪的是,精神分裂症患者的分离评分与他们报告的儿童期虐待无关。多元回归分析表明,DID 患者分离评分的 81%可以由 MID 的自我-异体体验量表预测,而精神分裂症患者分离评分的 92%可以由 MID 的声音量表预测。我们提出,精神分裂症患者对 MID 的反应并不代表 DID 患者的相同病理。我们认为,无论是对分离的现象学定义还是当前一代的分离仪器(其本质上都是现象学的)都无法区分 DID 的分离现象和我们怀疑的只是精神分裂症的类似分离现象。