• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定标准化伤口护理文档模型:一项旨在提高患者护理文档质量的德尔菲研究。

Developing the standardized wound care documentation model: a Delphi study to improve the quality of patient care documentation.

机构信息

Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;39(4):397-407; discussion 408. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e318259c45b.

DOI:10.1097/WON.0b013e318259c45b
PMID:22652938
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate a set of previously developed criteria for wound care documentation and to use the validated criteria as a framework for developing a wound care documentation model. The Skin Integrity component of the Finnish Care Classification, the Finnish Classification of Nursing Diagnosis, and the Finnish Classification of Nursing Interventions serve as the basis for the wound care documentation model.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Finnish wound care specialists, mainly nurses, from different Finnish hospitals, and from the Finnish Wound Care Society having on average 18 years of experience in wound management. Data were collected using electronic survey technology.

METHODS

A Delphi technique was used to develop and validate the documentation system.

RESULTS

The final model consists of 7 main categories and 25 subcategories of the Skin Integrity component of the Finnish Classification of Nursing Diagnosis and 5 main categories and 25 subcategories of the Skin Integrity component of the Finnish Classification of Nursing Intervention. Based on the results of the Delphi survey, consensus was reached on all elements of the wound care documentation model.

CONCLUSION

The Delphi process was used to develop a wound care documentation model for use in an electronic record to promote systematic documentation of both wound assessment and wound care. Future research should address the utility of this documentation model for nurses with expertise in wound care and generalist nurses.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证一套先前开发的伤口护理记录标准,并使用经过验证的标准作为开发伤口护理记录模型的框架。芬兰护理分类的皮肤完整性部分、芬兰护理诊断分类和芬兰护理干预分类是伤口护理记录模型的基础。

对象和设置

来自不同芬兰医院和芬兰伤口护理学会的芬兰伤口护理专家,主要是护士,平均有 18 年的伤口管理经验。使用电子调查技术收集数据。

方法

采用德尔菲技术开发和验证记录系统。

结果

最终模型由芬兰护理诊断分类的皮肤完整性部分的 7 个主要类别和 25 个子类别以及芬兰护理干预分类的皮肤完整性部分的 5 个主要类别和 25 个子类别组成。基于德尔菲调查的结果,在伤口护理记录模型的所有要素上都达成了共识。

结论

使用德尔菲法开发了一种用于电子病历的伤口护理记录模型,以促进对伤口评估和伤口护理的系统记录。未来的研究应针对具有伤口护理专业知识的护士和通科护士对这种记录模型的实用性进行研究。

相似文献

1
Developing the standardized wound care documentation model: a Delphi study to improve the quality of patient care documentation.制定标准化伤口护理文档模型:一项旨在提高患者护理文档质量的德尔菲研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;39(4):397-407; discussion 408. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e318259c45b.
2
The quality of paper-based versus electronic nursing care plan in Australian aged care homes: A documentation audit study.澳大利亚老年护理院中纸质版与电子版护理计划的质量:一项文档审核研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Aug;84(8):561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 8.
3
Drive Compliant Documentation Standards with a Specialty Wound Care Electronic Health Record.使用专业伤口护理电子健康记录推动合规文档标准。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018 Apr;31(4):190. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000531164.93924.4b.
4
The validation of AORN recommended practices in Finnish perioperative nursing documentation.芬兰围手术期护理文件中AORN推荐做法的验证。
AORN J. 2010 Feb;91(2):236-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2009.06.027.
5
Documentation Drivers for Effective Clinical and Patient Outcomes: Present and Future.有效临床和患者结果的文档驱动因素:现状与未来
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017 Feb;30(2):96. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000511881.03341.55.
6
Healthcare professionals' views on the mutual consistency of the Finnish Classification of Nursing Interventions and the Oulu Patient Classification.医疗保健专业人员对芬兰护理干预分类与奥卢患者分类相互一致性的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Sep;30(3):477-88. doi: 10.1111/scs.12266. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
[German national consensus on wound documentation of leg ulcer : Part 2: Routine care - classification of variable characteristics].[德国关于腿部溃疡伤口记录的全国共识:第2部分:常规护理——可变特征分类]
Hautarzt. 2017 Nov;68(11):896-911. doi: 10.1007/s00105-017-4012-6.
8
Consensus principles for wound care research obtained using a Delphi process.采用 Delphi 法获得的伤口护理研究共识原则。
Wound Repair Regen. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):284-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00790.x.
9
Use of the electronic medical record for trauma resuscitations: how does this impact documentation completeness?电子病历在创伤复苏中的应用:这对文档完整性有何影响?
J Trauma Nurs. 2013 Jul-Sep;20(3):166-8. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0b013e3182a17195.
10
An audit of the adequacy of acute wound care documentation of surgical inpatients.外科住院患者急性伤口护理文件记录充分性审核。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Aug;19(15-16):2207-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03265.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship between Nursing Practice Environment and Pressure Ulcer Care Quality in Portugal's Long-Term Care Units.葡萄牙长期护理机构中护理实践环境与压疮护理质量的关系
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;11(12):1751. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121751.
2
Quality registry improves the data of chronic ulcers: Validation of Tampere Wound Registry.质量登记册提高慢性溃疡数据质量:坦佩雷伤口登记册的验证。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3750-3759. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14270. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
3
Technical and Medical Aspects of Burn Size Assessment and Documentation.
烧伤面积评估与记录的技术和医学方面
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 5;57(3):242. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030242.
4
SCAMPs for Multimodal Post-Operative Analgesia: A Concept to Standardize and Individualize Care.用于多模式术后镇痛的SCAMPs:一种规范和个体化护理的概念
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2017 Jan;21(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11916-017-0603-2.