Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员对芬兰护理干预分类与奥卢患者分类相互一致性的看法。

Healthcare professionals' views on the mutual consistency of the Finnish Classification of Nursing Interventions and the Oulu Patient Classification.

作者信息

Liljamo Pia, Kinnunen Ulla-Mari, Saranto Kaija

机构信息

Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Sep;30(3):477-88. doi: 10.1111/scs.12266. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various classification schemes have been used for clinical and administrative purposes, but their concepts have seldom been cross-mapped. Cross-mapping is a formal method that can be used for examining existing classifications' validity.

AIM

The aim was to cross-map two nursing classifications - the Finnish Classification of Nursing Interventions (FiCNI, version 3.0), developed for structured nursing documentation, and the Oulu Patient Classification (OPCq), created for daily assessment of nursing intensity - and evaluate their mutual consistency. The objective was to obtain information on the content equivalence of the two classifications and the consistency of the concepts used, to inform further development of both.

METHODS

The Delphi method was utilised, with a panel of experts that included terminology developers, researchers, teachers and nurses (n = 16). Four Delphi rounds were required. In these, panellists selected the most relevant content from the OPCq subareas (n = 6) for each FiCNI main category and subcategory (n = 307). In cases of doubt, respondents were asked to justify their choices.

RESULTS

Response rates ranged from 68.8 to 93.8% in the Delphi rounds. After three rounds, 81.4% of the FiCNI categories were cross-mapped with sufficient consensus. A fourth round was needed for 57 FiCNI categories (18.6%). Most FiCNI categories (29.3%) were cross-mapped to the OPCq's subarea 2. Deficiencies in the concepts' clarity and in the OPCq's content areas complicated the cross-mapping. The most unambiguous categories of the FiCNI were found in the respiratory, cardiac and activity components. The components showing greatest ambiguity were skin integrity, mental balance and safety.

CONCLUSION

The content and concepts used in both classifications need further development. The cross-mapping results can be utilised for developing reuse of structured nursing data in assessment of nursing intensity and in decision-making in human-resources planning.

摘要

背景

各种分类方案已被用于临床和管理目的,但其概念很少进行交叉映射。交叉映射是一种可用于检验现有分类有效性的正式方法。

目的

旨在对两种护理分类进行交叉映射——为结构化护理记录而开发的芬兰护理干预分类(FiCNI,3.0版)以及为日常护理强度评估而创建的奥卢患者分类(OPCq)——并评估它们的相互一致性。目的是获取有关这两种分类的内容等效性以及所用概念一致性的信息,为两者的进一步发展提供参考。

方法

采用德尔菲法,专家小组由术语开发者、研究人员、教师和护士组成(n = 16)。共进行四轮德尔菲调查。在调查中,专家小组成员从OPCq的子领域(n = 6)中为每个FiCNI主要类别和子类别(n = 307)选择最相关的内容。如有疑问,要求受访者说明其选择理由。

结果

德尔菲调查各轮的回复率在68.8%至93.8%之间。三轮调查后,81.4%的FiCNI类别以足够的共识进行了交叉映射。57个FiCNI类别(18.6%)需要进行第四轮调查。大多数FiCNI类别(29.3%)被交叉映射到OPCq的子领域2。概念清晰度和OPCq内容领域的不足使交叉映射变得复杂。FiCNI中最明确的类别出现在呼吸、心脏和活动部分。最模糊的部分是皮肤完整性、心理平衡和安全。

结论

两种分类中使用的内容和概念都需要进一步发展。交叉映射结果可用于在护理强度评估和人力资源规划决策中开发结构化护理数据的再利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验