Suppr超能文献

确定影响癌症患者使用补充和替代医学的参数并检测其使用 prevalence。(注:“prevalence”常见释义为“流行率”“患病率”等,这里直接保留英文未翻译完整,可能是原文此处有误或不完整表述)

Determination of parameters affecting the use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients and detection of prevalence of use.

作者信息

Mayadagli Alpaslan, Aksu Atinc, Goksel Fatih, Gocen Erkan, Karahacioglu Eray, Gumus Mahmut, Pak Yücel

机构信息

Kartal Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2011;8(4):477-82. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v8i4.21. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out the frequency of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use that could lead to troubles in patient health and in applied standard therapy protocols when used improperly, which method is used, the reasons for use and from which resources the information about this topic were obtained. A questionnaire consisting of 28 questions was applied to 195 patients with cancer diagnosis by a face-to-face interview. The obtained data were assessed with SPSS 11.5 program. Out of 195 cancer patients, 100 (51.3%) were using CAM and 48.7% (n=95) were not. The most commonly used agent was nettle (72%). This was followed by herbal teas (21%), grape molasses (20%) and black seed (20%). The frequency of CAM use was found higher in those under age 50, in literate people, in those working during the diagnosis stage and having disease at the later stage. While CAM was commonly recommended by friends and relatives of the patients (73%), this ratio was only 5% for health professionals. While 51.3% of all patients were gathering information about CAM, 75% of those actually using CAM gathered information about it. Whilst information was gathered mostly from the relatives of patients and tamperers (47%), it can be gathered from physicians only with a ratio of 10%. Cancer patients use CAM and they gather information mainly from unreliable sources rather than physicians. Although the primary information source should be physicians, the ratio for this was very low (10%). We suggest that physicians should spend more time in gathering correct information and sharing them with their patients for a better guidance.

摘要

本研究旨在查明补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用频率,不当使用时可能会给患者健康和应用的标准治疗方案带来麻烦,使用的是哪种方法、使用原因以及从哪些来源获取有关该主题的信息。通过面对面访谈,向195名癌症诊断患者发放了一份由28个问题组成的问卷。使用SPSS 11.5程序对获得的数据进行评估。在195名癌症患者中,100名(51.3%)使用CAM,95名(48.7%)未使用。最常用的药物是荨麻(72%)。其次是花草茶(21%)、葡萄蜜(20%)和黑种草籽(20%)。发现50岁以下人群、识字者、诊断阶段仍在工作且疾病处于晚期的人群中CAM的使用频率较高。患者的朋友和亲属通常会推荐CAM(73%),而健康专业人员的推荐比例仅为5%。所有患者中有51.3%在收集有关CAM的信息,而实际使用CAM的患者中有75%收集了相关信息。虽然信息大多来自患者亲属和篡改者(47%),但从医生处获取信息的比例仅为10%。癌症患者使用CAM,他们主要从不可靠来源而非医生处收集信息。尽管主要信息来源应该是医生,但这一比例非常低(10%)。我们建议医生应花更多时间收集正确信息并与患者分享,以提供更好的指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验