Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, UK.
World Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;11(2):80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.005.
Current classification of eating disorders is failing to classify most clinical presentations; ignores continuities between child, adolescent and adult manifestations; and requires frequent changes of diagnosis to accommodate the natural course of these disorders. The classification is divorced from clinical practice, and investigators of clinical trials have felt compelled to introduce unsystematic modifications. Classification of feeding and eating disorders in ICD-11 requires substantial changes to remediate the shortcomings. We review evidence on the developmental and cross-cultural differences and continuities, course and distinctive features of feeding and eating disorders. We make the following recommendations: a) feeding and eating disorders should be merged into a single grouping with categories applicable across age groups; b) the category of anorexia nervosa should be broadened through dropping the requirement for amenorrhoea, extending the weight criterion to any significant underweight, and extending the cognitive criterion to include developmentally and culturally relevant presentations; c) a severity qualifier "with dangerously low body weight" should distinguish the severe cases of anorexia nervosa that carry the riskiest prognosis; d) bulimia nervosa should be extended to include subjective binge eating; e) binge eating disorder should be included as a specific category defined by subjective or objective binge eating in the absence of regular compensatory behaviour; f) combined eating disorder should classify subjects who sequentially or concurrently fulfil criteria for both anorexia and bulimia nervosa; g) avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder should classify restricted food intake in children or adults that is not accompanied by body weight and shape related psychopathology; h) a uniform minimum duration criterion of four weeks should apply.
目前的饮食失调分类未能对大多数临床症状进行分类;忽略了儿童、青少年和成人表现之间的连续性;并且需要频繁更改诊断以适应这些障碍的自然病程。该分类与临床实践脱节,临床试验的研究者不得不引入非系统性的修改。ICD-11 中的喂养和进食障碍分类需要进行重大修改以弥补这些缺陷。我们回顾了有关喂养和进食障碍的发展和跨文化差异和连续性、病程和特征的证据。我们提出以下建议:a) 将喂养和进食障碍合并为一个适用于所有年龄段的单一分类;b) 通过放弃对闭经的要求、将体重标准扩展到任何明显的体重不足以及将认知标准扩展到包括与发育和文化相关的表现,拓宽神经性厌食症的范畴;c) “伴有极低体重”的严重程度限定符应区分具有最危险预后的严重神经性厌食症病例;d) 将神经性贪食症扩展到包括主观暴食;e) 将暴食障碍纳入一个特定类别,定义为无规律补偿行为的主观或客观暴食;f) 将合并性进食障碍分类为先后或同时符合神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症标准的个体;g) 避免/限制食物摄入障碍应将儿童或成人的限制食物摄入分类为不伴有与体重和体型相关的精神病理学的情况;h) 应统一采用至少四周的最短持续时间标准。