Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 May 22.
Ethically acceptable applications of fetal tissue engineering as a perinatal therapy can be expanded beyond life-threatening anomalies by amniotic fluid cell-based methods, in which cell procurement poses no additional risk to the mother. We sought to start to determine whether osseous grafts engineered from amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (aMSCs) could be an adjunct to craniofacial repair.
New Zealand rabbits (n = 12) underwent creation of a full-thickness diploic nasal bone defect. We then equally divided animals into two groups based on how the defect was repaired: namely, size-matched implants of electrospun biodegradable nanofibers with or without nuclear labeled, allogeneic aMSCs maintained in osteogenic medium. We killed animals 8 wk post-implantation for multiple analyses. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance, post-hoc Bonferroni adjusted comparisons, and Levene's F-test, as appropriate (P < 0.05), with significance set at P < 0.05.
Micro-computed tomography scanning (two- and three-dimensional) showed no significant differences in defect radiodensity between groups. However, extracellular calcium levels were significantly higher in engineered grafts than in acellular implants (P = 0.003). There was significantly greater variability in mineralization in acellular implants than in engineered grafts by both direct calcium (P = 0.008) and micro-computed tomography measurements (P = 0.032). There were no significant differences in alkaline phosphatase activity or variance between groups. We documented labeled cells in the engineered grafts.
Craniofacial repair with osseous grafts engineered from aMSCs lead to enhanced and more consistent mineralization compared with an equivalent acellular prosthetic repair. Amniotic fluid-derived engineered bone may become a practical adjunct to perinatal craniofacial reconstruction.
通过羊水细胞为基础的方法,在不增加母亲额外风险的情况下,可将胎儿组织工程作为围产期治疗的方法应用于危及生命的畸形之外。我们试图开始确定由羊水间充质干细胞(aMSCs)工程化的骨移植物是否可以作为颅面修复的辅助手段。
新西兰兔(n = 12)进行全层板状鼻骨缺损。然后,我们根据缺陷的修复方式将动物分为两组:即大小匹配的电纺可生物降解纳米纤维植入物,具有或不具有核标记的、在成骨培养基中维持的同种异体 aMSCs。植入后 8 周处死动物进行多项分析。统计分析包括方差分析、事后 Bonferroni 调整比较和 Levene F 检验(视情况而定,P < 0.05),以 P < 0.05 为显著性标准。
微计算机断层扫描(二维和三维)显示两组之间的缺陷密度无显著差异。然而,细胞外钙水平在工程化移植物中明显高于无细胞植入物(P = 0.003)。通过直接钙(P = 0.008)和微计算机断层扫描测量(P = 0.032),无细胞植入物中的矿化变异明显大于工程化移植物。两组间碱性磷酸酶活性或变异无显著差异。我们在工程化移植物中记录到标记细胞。
与等效的无细胞假体修复相比,由 aMSCs 工程化的骨移植物进行颅面修复可导致增强和更一致的矿化。羊水来源的工程化骨可能成为围产期颅面重建的实用辅助手段。