Larré S, Quintens H, Houéde N, Compérat E, Roy C, Pignot G, Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Wallerand H, Soulié M, Pfister C
Sous-comité vessie du Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, France.
Prog Urol. 2012 Jun;22(7):380-7. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy or nephroureterectomy confers improved prognosis and eventually therapeutic advantage. The aim of this update is to clarify the anatomical limits of the lymph node dissection, imaging related techniques, possible difficulties related to pathological analysis, its prognostic value and adjuvant treatments.
A literature review was performed using PubMed database with a combination of the following keywords: "urothelial carcinoma", "lymph node excision", "imaging", "pathology analysis", "prognosis", "chemotherapy" and "radiotherapy".
Regarding bladder tumours, extended lymph node dissection is usually performed up to the division of the iliac vessels and the crossing of the ureters. The CT scan is the recommended imaging technique for lymph node staging but its sensitivity is low. Pathological examination should include perivesicle lymph nodes analysis and report the number of normal and metastatic lymph nodes separately. The prognosis is correlated to the total number of lymph nodes removed and to the extent of the excision. The lymph node density (number of metastatic nodes/normal nodes) is the most important prognosis factor. Adjuvant chemotherapy has not demonstrated a clear advantage. Its most efficient modality is a combination including cisplatin. For upper urinary tract tumours, lymph node dissection may have an impact on survival but definitive conclusion is limited by the lack of surgical technique and indications standardisation.
Extended lymph node dissection improves survival of bladder cancer and prognosis assessment that could eventually be used to stratify patient requiring adjuvant treatment (level of evidence 3). Improvement on survival was also suggested for upper urinary tract tumors (level of evidence 4).
根治性膀胱切除术或肾输尿管切除术中的淋巴结清扫可改善预后并最终带来治疗优势。本次更新的目的是阐明淋巴结清扫的解剖学界限、与影像相关的技术、病理分析可能存在的困难、其预后价值及辅助治疗。
使用PubMed数据库进行文献综述,关键词组合如下:“尿路上皮癌”、“淋巴结切除”、“影像”、“病理分析”、“预后”、“化疗”及“放疗”。
对于膀胱肿瘤,通常进行扩大淋巴结清扫至髂血管分支和输尿管交叉处。CT扫描是推荐用于淋巴结分期的影像技术,但其敏感性较低。病理检查应包括膀胱周围淋巴结分析,并分别报告正常和转移淋巴结的数量。预后与切除的淋巴结总数及切除范围相关。淋巴结密度(转移淋巴结数/正常淋巴结数)是最重要的预后因素。辅助化疗尚未显示出明显优势。其最有效的方式是包括顺铂的联合方案。对于上尿路肿瘤,淋巴结清扫可能对生存有影响,但由于缺乏手术技术和适应证标准化,尚无定论。
扩大淋巴结清扫可提高膀胱癌的生存率及预后评估,最终可用于对需要辅助治疗的患者进行分层(证据级别3)。上尿路肿瘤的生存率也有提高的迹象(证据级别4)。