• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创经皮钢板接骨术(MIPPO)治疗胫骨干骺端及骨干骨折的结果

The results of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in distal and diaphyseal tibial fractures.

作者信息

Aksekili Mehmet Atif Erol, Celik Ismail, Arslan Arslan Kağan, Kalkan Tuğhan, Uğurlu Mahmut

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(3):161-7. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2597.

DOI:10.3944/aott.2012.2597
PMID:22659631
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the time to union and complications in cases of tibial diaphysis and distal tibial fractures fixed with a minimally invasive percutaneous plate.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients (23 males, 12 females) were operated on using minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) principles for tibial diaphysis and distal tibial fractures. Twenty-eight were closed and seven were open fractures. After direct or indirect fracture reduction, the plate was advanced through a submuscular extraperiosteal tunnel through the distal incision without opening the fracture line. The plate was fixed with screws through the proximal and distal incisions. Clinical and radiological evaluations were made at four to six week intervals after surgery. Full weight-bearing was allowed after an average of 14.43 (range: 12 to 20) weeks and 15.39 (range: 8 to 32) weeks in open and closed fractures, respectively. Duration of the union and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the union was 20.7 (range: 16 to 28) weeks and 17.96 (range: 10 to 36) weeks in open and closed fractures, respectively. All cases showed union except one who had an implant failure. Necrosis at the wound developed in one case and infection in another.

CONCLUSION

MIPPO is an effective alternative treatment for tibial diaphysis and distal tibia fractures with low complication and high union rates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估采用微创经皮钢板固定胫骨干和胫骨远端骨折时的骨愈合时间及并发症情况。

方法

35例患者(23例男性,12例女性)接受了基于微创经皮钢板接骨术(MIPPO)原则的胫骨干和胫骨远端骨折手术。其中28例为闭合性骨折,7例为开放性骨折。在直接或间接复位骨折后,通过远端切口经肌肉下骨膜外隧道推进钢板,而不打开骨折线。通过近端和远端切口用螺钉固定钢板。术后每隔4至6周进行临床和影像学评估。开放性骨折和闭合性骨折分别在平均14.43周(范围:12至20周)和15.39周(范围:8至32周)后允许完全负重。分析骨愈合持续时间及并发症情况。

结果

开放性骨折和闭合性骨折的平均骨愈合时间分别为20.7周(范围:16至28周)和17.96周(范围:10至36周)。除1例发生植入物失败外,所有病例均实现骨愈合。1例出现伤口坏死,另1例出现感染。

结论

MIPPO是治疗胫骨干和胫骨远端骨折的一种有效替代方法,并发症发生率低,骨愈合率高。

相似文献

1
The results of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in distal and diaphyseal tibial fractures.微创经皮钢板接骨术(MIPPO)治疗胫骨干骺端及骨干骨折的结果
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(3):161-7. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2597.
2
Limited Open Reduction and Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis - Alternative Option to Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Management of Distal Tibia Fractures.有限切开复位经皮钢板接骨术——治疗胫骨远端骨折的微创钢板接骨术替代方案
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Oct-Dec;56(208):456-60.
3
Absolute or relative stability in minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis of simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures?单纯胫骨远端干骺端或骨干骨折微创钢板接骨术中的绝对或相对稳定性?
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1217-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
[Treatment of Fractures of the Distal Third of Tibia Diaphysis by MIPO Technique].[应用微创经皮钢板内固定技术治疗胫骨干下1/3骨折]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(2):114-119.
5
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate for distal diametaphyseal tibia fracture.锁定加压钢板微创接骨术治疗胫骨干骺端远端骨折
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2011 Apr-Jun;9(34):62-8. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v9i2.6291.
6
Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of extra-articular distal tibia fractures.微创经皮钢板与切开复位内固定治疗关节外胫骨远端骨折的比较。
Injury. 2013 Aug;44(8):1102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
Minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia--results in 20 patients.微创锁定钢板接骨术治疗胫骨远端骨折——20例患者的结果
Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):877-87. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
8
[Close reduction combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for proximal and distal tibial fractures: a report of 56 patients].闭合复位联合微创经皮钢板接骨术治疗胫骨干骺端骨折:56例报告
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2013 Mar;26(3):248-51.
9
Management of distal third tibial fractures: comparison of combined internal and external fixation with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis.胫骨远端三分之一骨折的治疗:联合内固定与外固定与微创经皮钢板接骨术的比较
Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2349-55. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2467-y. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
10
[Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation for distal tibial fractures in adults: a meta-analysis].[成人胫骨远端骨折的微创经皮钢板接骨术与切开复位内固定术:一项荟萃分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Aug;28(8):757-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous clamp reduction technique using plate as a position template during minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.在微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨干骨折过程中,使用钢板作为位置模板的经皮钳夹复位技术。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Jul 3;26(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00859-6.
2
Double Squeeze Reduction Clamp Technique for Fracture Stabilization: A Case Report.用于骨折固定的双挤压复位夹技术:病例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 May;14(5):22-27. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i05.4420.
3
Comparison of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Minimally Invasive Plating in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures: A Retrospective Study.
切开复位内固定与微创钢板内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折的比较:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2022 Mar 14;14(3):e23144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23144. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.交锁髓内钉与微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨远端骨折的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):954-965. doi: 10.1111/os.12575.
5
Distal tibia fractures: locked or non-locked plating? A systematic review of outcomes.胫骨远端骨折:锁定或非锁定接骨板?系统评价结果。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Jun;85(3):299-304. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.913226. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
6
Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study.三种不同手术方法治疗胫骨远端干骺端骨折:一项随机、前瞻性研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2294-1. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
7
Assisting the positioning of the proximal portion of percutaneous anterolateral distal tibial periarticular plates.辅助经皮胫骨干骺端前外侧关节周围钢板近端的定位。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Apr;95(3):224-5. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.3.224.
8
Minimally invasive treatment for pubic ramus fractures combined with a sacroiliac joint complex injury.耻骨支骨折合并骶髂关节复合体损伤的微创治疗。
Int Orthop. 2013 Aug;37(8):1547-54. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1954-x. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
9
Treatment of distal tibial fractures with the Ilizarov external fixator--a prospective observational study in 39 consecutive patients.采用伊利扎洛夫外固定架治疗胫骨远端骨折-39 例连续患者的前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 17;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-30.