Department of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0438, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2012 Jun;76(6):739-45.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of students in a U.S. dental school to learn and apply two indices of orthodontic need: the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) and the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). Dental students were randomly selected and separated into three groups: control, IOTN, and ICON. Each evaluated thirty casts that had previously been evaluated by a panel of thirteen orthodontists to develop a gold standard of orthodontic treatment need for these casts. Students re-evaluated the same thirty casts after IOTN and ICON training for their own group, while the control group did not receive any training. Logistic regression of pre- and post-training agreement with the gold standard was calculated for each group to create a clear quadratic relationship. Significant differences were not found between pre- and post-training evaluation for either the IOTN or the ICON groups as compared to the control. However, the IOTN group did show more improvement when compared with the ICON group. This study demonstrates that the use of the IOTN index improved assessment in predoctoral dental students to determine orthodontic treatment need.
正畸治疗需求指数(IOTN)和复杂性、结果与需求指数(ICON)。随机选择牙科学学生并将其分为三组:对照组、IOTN 组和 ICON 组。每组评估三十个模型,这些模型先前已由十三位正畸专家小组评估,以确定这些模型的正畸治疗需求的金标准。在 IOTN 和 ICON 培训后,学生们重新评估了自己组的相同三十个模型,而对照组没有接受任何培训。对每组的金标准进行了训练前后的一致性进行逻辑回归分析,以建立明确的二次关系。与对照组相比,IOTN 组和 ICON 组的培训前后评估均未发现显著差异。然而,与 ICON 组相比,IOTN 组的评估确实有了更多的改善。本研究表明,IOTN 指数的使用提高了牙科学前学生评估正畸治疗需求的能力。