Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Mutzbauer & Partner, Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Anesthesiology, Tiefenhoefe 11, CH-8001 Zuerich, Switzerland.
Emerg Med J. 2013 May;30(5):382-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201331. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
Gastric inflation is a significant issue when ventilation of the unprotected airway is performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a prototype pressure relief valve with an acoustic expiration control mechanism connected to two different masks.
12 non-physician healthcare professionals (group 1) and 10 newly certified dentists (group 2) performed 10 cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin using this device compared with mouth-to-mouth technique. Dentists also employed a mask without the valve. Lower oesophageal sphincter pressures had been adjusted to 1.5 kPa (group 1) and 0.3 kPa (group 2); the valve relief pressure to 1.5 kPa (group 1) and 2.0 kPa (group 2).
In group 1 tidal volumes by valve mask techniques (medians 350 and 400 ml) differed minimally from mouth-to-mouth ventilation (medians 475 and 600 ml). Almost no gastric inflation was observed. Gastric inflation only occurred using the safety valve connected to the mask (median 122 ml) and the mask alone (median 260 ml) (p=0.004). Only in group 1 the acoustic device delivered adequate signals.
Gastric inflation occurred less frequently and to a lesser extent when the valve was connected, going ahead with a trend towards lower tidal volumes. The protective effect of the safety valve may be of benefit even if it leads to smaller tidal volumes.
在对未保护气道进行通气时,胃充气是一个重大问题。本研究的目的是评估一种带有声学呼气控制机构的原型压力安全阀,该安全阀连接到两种不同的面罩。
12 名非医师医疗保健专业人员(第 1 组)和 10 名新认证的牙医(第 2 组)使用该设备在模型上进行了 10 个心肺复苏周期,与口对口技术进行比较。牙医还使用了没有阀门的面罩。下食管括约肌压力已调整至 1.5 kPa(第 1 组)和 0.3 kPa(第 2 组);安全阀释放压力调整至 1.5 kPa(第 1 组)和 2.0 kPa(第 2 组)。
在第 1 组中,通过阀面罩技术的潮气量(中位数为 350 和 400 ml)与口对口通气(中位数为 475 和 600 ml)相差极小。几乎没有观察到胃充气。仅当安全阀门连接到面罩(中位数 122 ml)和单独使用面罩(中位数 260 ml)时才会发生胃充气(p=0.004)。只有在第 1 组中,声学设备才能发出足够的信号。
当连接阀门时,胃充气的发生频率和程度较低,潮气量呈下降趋势。即使安全阀门会导致较小的潮气量,但其保护作用可能仍然有益。