Suppr超能文献

心脏不停跳与含血停搏液在复杂心脏手术中的应用:澳大利亚经验。

Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in complex cardiac operations: an Australian experience.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Mar;43(3):526-31. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs319. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A single or dual-dose strategy for myocardial protection is attractive in long operations, in avoiding the need to interrupt the procedure to re-administer cardioplegia. We hypothesized that a single administration of Bretschneider histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) crystalloid solution (Custodiol) offers myocardial protection comparable with repeated tepid blood cardioplegia.

METHODS

We reviewed a prospectively compiled single-centre database containing all adult cardiac procedures performed from January 2005 to January 2011. Preoperative demographic and investigative data, operative variables and postoperative (30-day) mortality and morbidity were compared between the Custodiol and blood cardioplegia groups. The study primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, return to the operating theatre, myocardial infarction, stroke, postoperative requirement for an intra-aortic balloon pump, new renal failure, prolonged ventilation and re-admission to hospital within 30 days. Propensity score matching was performed to correct for any bias that may have been associated with the usage of Custodiol.

RESULTS

A total of 1900 cardiac surgical procedures were identified of which 126 (7%) utilized Custodiol and 1774 (93%) used blood cardioplegia as the primary cardioplegic agent. After propensity-score matching, we were able to match 71 Custodiol cases one-to-one to those receiving blood cardioplegia. There were no statistically significant differences noted for any of the endpoints studied after propensity-score matching. In particular, the proportion of mortality (blood cardioplegia: 1 vs Custodiol 4%, P = 0.63) any mortality/morbidity (blood cardioplegia: 35 vs Custodiol: 39% P = 0.46) was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Custodiol is convenient, simple and at least as safe as tepid blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in complex cardiac operations. A randomized prospective comparison of myocardial protection strategies is warranted.

摘要

目的

在长时间的手术中,单次或双剂量心肌保护策略具有吸引力,可以避免需要中断手术重新给予心脏停搏液。我们假设单次给予 Bretschneider 组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸(HTK)晶体溶液(Custodiol)提供的心肌保护与重复使用温热血心脏停搏液相当。

方法

我们回顾了一个前瞻性汇编的单中心数据库,其中包含 2005 年 1 月至 2011 年 1 月期间进行的所有成人心脏手术。比较 Custodiol 和血心脏停搏液组的术前人口统计学和检查数据、手术变量以及术后(30 天)死亡率和发病率。该研究的主要终点是 30 天死亡率、返回手术室、心肌梗死、中风、术后需要主动脉内球囊泵、新发肾衰竭、延长通气和 30 天内再次入院。进行倾向评分匹配以纠正可能与 Custodiol 使用相关的任何偏差。

结果

确定了 1900 例心脏外科手术,其中 126 例(7%)使用 Custodiol,1774 例(93%)使用血心脏停搏液作为主要心脏停搏液。在进行倾向评分匹配后,我们能够将 71 例 Custodiol 病例一对一地与接受血心脏停搏液的病例相匹配。在倾向评分匹配后,研究的任何终点均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。特别是,死亡率(血心脏停搏液:1%比 Custodiol4%,P=0.63)和任何死亡率/发病率(血心脏停搏液:35%比 Custodiol:39%,P=0.46)的比例在两组之间相似。

结论

在复杂心脏手术中,使用 Custodiol 进行心肌保护既方便、简单,又至少与使用温热血心脏停搏液一样安全。需要进行随机前瞻性比较心肌保护策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验